* New watchdog and watchdog-next branches to augment the existing ones
@ 2013-10-02 17:59 Guenter Roeck
2013-10-09 6:24 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2013-10-02 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-watchdog
Cc: Rob Landley, Russell King, Wim Van Sebroeck, Johannes Thumshirn,
Dinh Nguyen, Pavel Machek, Jamie Iles, Jonas Jensen, John Crispin,
Xianglong Du, Barry Song, Tony Lindgren, Nicolas Ferre,
Felipe Balbi
Hi all,
to support Wim in his efforts to maintain the watchdog subsystem,
I created two new branches in my repository at kernel.org
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git
The two branches are
watchdog for watchdog patches I believe should be applied
to the current upstream kernel
watchdog-next for patches I believe are ready to be pushed upstream
in the next commit window.
Both branches may and will be rebased from time to time as I see fit. watchdog
will in general be based on a recent upstream tag, and watchdog-next will be
based on watchdog. As of today, the watchdog branch is based on v3.12-rc3.
The new branches are not supposed to replace Wim's repository, but to augment it.
It enables me to run my own automated build tests (see
http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders for current build results), and it will
hopefully trigger builds by Fengguang's build robots with the various patches
applied.
I also set up patchwork to track the watchdog mailing lists at
http://server.roeck-us.net/project/linux-watchdog/list/. This is mostly for
myself to ensure that patches don't get lost, but it is accessible for others
as well.
I hope this will help Wim in deciding if and when to push patches upstream; at
the very least it will provide additional test coverage. Note that I don't plan
to add the watchdog-next branch to linux-next, as the decision if and when
to push patches upstream is up to Wim to make.
Thanks,
Guenter
---
P.s.: If you are on the Cc: list, it is most likely because you signed off
at least one of the patches in one of the branches.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: New watchdog and watchdog-next branches to augment the existing ones
2013-10-02 17:59 New watchdog and watchdog-next branches to augment the existing ones Guenter Roeck
@ 2013-10-09 6:24 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2013-10-09 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: linux-watchdog, Rob Landley, Russell King, Wim Van Sebroeck,
Johannes Thumshirn, Dinh Nguyen, Pavel Machek, Jamie Iles,
Jonas Jensen, John Crispin, Xianglong Du, Barry Song,
Tony Lindgren, Nicolas Ferre, Felipe Balbi
2013/10/3 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>:
> Hi all,
>
> to support Wim in his efforts to maintain the watchdog subsystem,
> I created two new branches in my repository at kernel.org
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git
it is fine to see that.
>
> The two branches are
> watchdog for watchdog patches I believe should be applied
> to the current upstream kernel
> watchdog-next for patches I believe are ready to be pushed upstream
> in the next commit window.
>
> Both branches may and will be rebased from time to time as I see fit. watchdog
> will in general be based on a recent upstream tag, and watchdog-next will be
> based on watchdog. As of today, the watchdog branch is based on v3.12-rc3.
>
> The new branches are not supposed to replace Wim's repository, but to augment it.
> It enables me to run my own automated build tests (see
> http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders for current build results), and it will
> hopefully trigger builds by Fengguang's build robots with the various patches
> applied.
>
> I also set up patchwork to track the watchdog mailing lists at
> http://server.roeck-us.net/project/linux-watchdog/list/. This is mostly for
> myself to ensure that patches don't get lost, but it is accessible for others
> as well.
>
> I hope this will help Wim in deciding if and when to push patches upstream; at
> the very least it will provide additional test coverage. Note that I don't plan
> to add the watchdog-next branch to linux-next, as the decision if and when
> to push patches upstream is up to Wim to make.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
> ---
-barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-09 6:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-02 17:59 New watchdog and watchdog-next branches to augment the existing ones Guenter Roeck
2013-10-09 6:24 ` Barry Song
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).