From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]:37422 "EHLO mail-we0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752545Ab3JVLCs (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Oct 2013 07:02:48 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x55so7638760wes.8 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:02:42 +0100 From: Jamie Iles To: Dinh Nguyen Cc: Mark Rutland , Guenter Roeck , "dinguyen@altera.com" , Jamie Iles , Viresh Kumar , Wim Van Sebroeck , Pavel Machek , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv2] watchdog: dw: Enable OF support for DW watchdog timer. Message-ID: <20131022110242.GA7560@maple> References: <1380739472-26172-1-git-send-email-dinguyen@altera.com> <20131021110532.GA8144@kartoffel> <5265C9B0.2060003@roeck-us.net> <20131022103936.GA5511@kartoffel> <52665A1E.5020700@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52665A1E.5020700@gmail.com> Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 05:57:34AM -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > On 10/22/13 5:39 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >Does the device have any interrupts, even if they're unused? > Yes, the device does have an interrupt. Should I add it as an > optional property? iirc the interrupt feature is part of the IP configuration so not all instantiations will have the interrupt, so this should be an optional property. Jamie