From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
wim@iguana.be, dzickus@redhat.com, bhe@redhat.com,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add a parameter for stop wdt before register
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:55:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140115165512.GD3180@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140115121556.0407a099@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:15:56PM +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > watchdog and crash dump really conflicts to some degree, from the watchdog
> > point of view it can reboot system whhen kdump kernel hangs. But from kdump
> > point of view it want ensure saving the vmcore for later debugging.
> >
> > Maybe we can only select only one in this case.
>
> You want to be able to make a decision at runtime which to use.
>
> > > - if it can be stopped, you can open and stop it
> >
> > For the last one since crashing happens we have no chance to open and stop.
>
> When you decide you need to set up to catch a core rather than just
> crash you can open and stop the watchdog (if supported), and you can then
> set up for a kdump and then at some point later if it crashes capture the
> dump.
Disabling watchdog if kdump serice starts will not make many happy. If
kernel hangs, we don't have a functionality to reboot it.
What about other idea of keeping watchdog interval long enough that new
kernel can boot, driver can load and then new driver/user space can
continue to kick the watchdog. And if second kernel hangs, watchdog will
reboot the system.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-15 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-14 8:23 [PATCH] watchdog: add a parameter for stop wdt before register Dave Young
2014-01-14 8:26 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2014-01-14 8:41 ` Dave Young
2014-01-14 9:44 ` Dave Young
2014-01-14 12:16 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-01-14 16:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-01-15 1:11 ` Dave Young
2014-01-15 16:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-01-16 1:50 ` Dave Young
2014-01-15 0:59 ` Dave Young
2014-01-15 12:15 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-01-15 16:55 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2014-01-16 1:52 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140115165512.GD3180@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).