From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] watchdog: Add API to trigger reboots
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 12:45:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140505194545.GA30333@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140505183606.GJ17875@saruman.home>
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:41:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Some hardware implements reboot through its watchdog hardware,
> > for example by triggering a watchdog timeout. Platform specific
> > code starts to spread into watchdog drivers, typically by setting
> > pointers to a callback functions which is then called from the
> > platform reset handler.
> >
> > To simplify code and provide a unified API to trigger reboots by
> > watchdog drivers, provide a single API to trigger such reboots
> > through the watchdog subsystem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > ---
> > drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/watchdog.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
> > index cec9b55..4ec6e2f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
> > @@ -43,6 +43,17 @@
> > static DEFINE_IDA(watchdog_ida);
> > static struct class *watchdog_class;
> >
> > +static struct watchdog_device *wdd_reboot_dev;
> > +
> > +void watchdog_do_reboot(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
> > +{
> > + if (wdd_reboot_dev) {
> > + if (wdd_reboot_dev->ops->reboot)
>
> you can decrease one level of indentation:
>
> if (wdd_reboot_dev && wdd_reboot_dev->ops->reboot)
>
> also, shouldn't you test if 'ops' is valid too ? In that case:
>
> if (wdd_reboot_dev && wdd_reboot_dev->ops &&
> wdd_reboot_dev->ops->reboot)
>
Hmmm ... makes me think.
If ops->reboot is not set, wdd_reboot_dev should be NULL
to start with, since it is only initialized if ops->reboot
is not NULL.
It is not common in the Linux kernel to re-check pointers
if the condition can not occur, so I don't think it should
be done here.
In other words, I should probably remove the ops check as well.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-05 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-01 15:41 [RFC PATCH 0/5] watchdog: Add reboot API Guenter Roeck
2014-05-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] watchdog: Add API to trigger reboots Guenter Roeck
2014-05-02 10:01 ` Will Deacon
2014-05-02 13:22 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-03 1:22 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-03 4:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-05 4:27 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-07 11:52 ` Lucas Stach
2014-05-07 13:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-07 15:49 ` Lucas Stach
2014-05-07 19:15 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-05 18:36 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-05-05 19:45 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-05-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] arm64: Support reboot through watchdog subsystem Guenter Roeck
2014-05-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] arm: " Guenter Roeck
2014-05-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] watchdog: moxart: Register reboot handler with " Guenter Roeck
2014-05-01 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] watchdog: sunxi: " Guenter Roeck
2014-05-05 18:26 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] watchdog: Add reboot API Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-06 14:29 ` Jonas Jensen
2014-05-07 11:01 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140505194545.GA30333@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jonas.jensen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).