From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] kernel: Add support for restart notifier call chain
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:59:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140630195946.GI32514@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404155499-21177-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net>
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:11:33PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Various drivers implement architecture and/or device specific means
> to restart (reset) the system. Various mechanisms have been implemented
> to support those schemes. The best known mechanism is arm_pm_restart,
> which is a function pointer to be set either from platform specific code
> or from drivers. Another mechanism is to use hardware watchdogs to issue
> a reset; this mechanism is used if there is no other method available
> to reset a board or system. Two examples are alim7101_wdt, which currently
> uses the reboot notifier to trigger a reset, and moxart_wdt, which registers
> the arm_pm_restart function.
>
> The existing mechanisms have a number of drawbacks. Typically only one scheme
> to restart the system is supported (at least if arm_pm_restart is used).
> At least in theory there can be mutliple means to restart the system, some of
> which may be less desirable (for example one mechanism may only reset the CPU,
> while another may reset the entire system). Using arm_pm_restart can also be
> racy if the function pointer is set from a driver, as the driver may be in
> the process of being unloaded when arm_pm_restart is called.
> Using the reboot notifier is always racy, as it is unknown if and when
> other functions using the reboot notifier have completed execution
> by the time the watchdog fires.
>
> To solve the problem, introduce a system restart notifier. This notifier
> is expected to be called from the architecture specific machine_restart()
> function. Drivers providing system restart functionality (such as the watchdog
> drivers mentioned above) are expected to register with this notifier.
>
> Patch 1 of this series implements the notifier function. Patches 2 and 3
> implement calling the notifier chain from arm and arm64 restart code.
> Patch 4 and 5 convert existing restart handlers in the watchdog subsystem
> to use the restart notifier. Patch 6 unexports arm_pm_restart to ensure
> that no one gets the idea to implement a restart handler as module.
I think you need to restructure stuff somewhat, because I think
you've missed drivers/power/reset/ entirely, or at least you've
missed drivers/power/reset/restart-poweroff.c which calls
arm_pm_restart directly. I'm not quite sure how we ended up with
that...
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-30 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-30 19:11 [RFC PATCH 0/6] kernel: Add support for restart notifier call chain Guenter Roeck
2014-06-30 19:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] " Guenter Roeck
2014-06-30 19:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] arm64: Support restart through " Guenter Roeck
2014-07-01 7:26 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-07-01 13:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-06-30 19:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] arm: " Guenter Roeck
2014-06-30 19:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-30 19:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] watchdog: moxart: Register restart handler with restart notifier Guenter Roeck
2014-06-30 19:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] watchdog: alim7101: " Guenter Roeck
2014-06-30 19:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] arm/arm64: Unexport restart handlers Guenter Roeck
2014-06-30 19:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-06-30 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] kernel: Add support for restart notifier call chain Guenter Roeck
2014-07-01 11:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 13:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-01 17:08 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140630195946.GI32514@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jonas.jensen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).