From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:36400 "EHLO mail-wi0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750798AbbG1RcW (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:32:22 -0400 Received: by wicgb10 with SMTP id gb10so166781006wic.1 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 18:32:16 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Matt Fleming , Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Mika Westerberg , Andy Shevchenko , Jean Delvare , Wolfram Sang , Matt Fleming , Peter Tyser , Samuel Ortiz , Aaron Sierra Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] iTCO_wdt: Expose watchdog properties using platform data Message-ID: <20150728173216.GC2284@x1> References: <1438004292-16382-1-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> <1438004292-16382-2-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150728094643.GT14943@x1> <20150728110717.GH2492@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150728113721.GU14943@x1> <20150728124338.GA2773@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150728150021.GX14943@x1> <55B79D60.4080807@roeck-us.net> <20150728152832.GY14943@x1> <55B7B707.8060606@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE In-Reply-To: <55B7B707.8060606@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 07/28/2015 08:28 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > >On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > >>On 07/28/2015 08:00 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > >>>On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Matt Fleming wrote: > >>>>On Tue, 28 Jul, at 12:37:21PM, Lee Jones wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>The driver shouldn't be called that either. > >>>>> > >>>>>You are the only one. What makes iTCO 'special'? > >>>> > >>>>I don't know, I didn't write it. It looks like Wim did ~9 years a= go, so > >>>>it must have made sense to him at the time. > >>>> > >> > >>Coding style wasn't as strict then as it is today. iTCO has just be= en kept > >>for historic reasons. > > > >For sure, I get that, but it doesn't mean we can't do-the-right-thin= g > >(tm) now does it? > > > >>Sure, we could have changed it to lowercase, but so far no one both= ered. > >>Plus, of course, there is always the element that some maintainers = hate > >>that kind of cleanup, > > > >Really? Surely any kind of clean-up is good clean-up. Especially a= s > >Greg KH et. al, have been doing public presentations telling everyon= e > >that there is always kernel work for anyone who has the time; spelli= ng > >corrections and all. > > >=20 > Yes, really. Just try to submit cleanup patches to maintainers other = than > Greg and myself, and you'll see. It is a minefield. Admittedly some of us have our quirks, but I'm happy to challenge anyone that won't accept clean-up patches that make things better. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdo= g" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html