From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:38467 "EHLO mail-wi0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752659AbbG2HaR (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2015 03:30:17 -0400 Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so13145944wib.1 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:30:13 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Matt Fleming , Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Mika Westerberg , Andy Shevchenko , Jean Delvare , Wolfram Sang , Matt Fleming , Peter Tyser , Samuel Ortiz , Aaron Sierra Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] iTCO_wdt: Expose watchdog properties using platform data Message-ID: <20150729073013.GE2284@x1> References: <20150728094643.GT14943@x1> <20150728110717.GH2492@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150728113721.GU14943@x1> <20150728124338.GA2773@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150728150021.GX14943@x1> <55B79D60.4080807@roeck-us.net> <20150728152832.GY14943@x1> <55B7B707.8060606@roeck-us.net> <20150728173216.GC2284@x1> <20150728185143.GA5382@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150728185143.GA5382@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 06:32:16PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >=20 > > > On 07/28/2015 08:28 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > >On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > > > >>On 07/28/2015 08:00 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > >>>On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Matt Fleming wrote: > > > >>>>On Tue, 28 Jul, at 12:37:21PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>The driver shouldn't be called that either. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>You are the only one. What makes iTCO 'special'? > > > >>>> > > > >>>>I don't know, I didn't write it. It looks like Wim did ~9 years= ago, so > > > >>>>it must have made sense to him at the time. > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > >>Coding style wasn't as strict then as it is today. iTCO has just = been kept > > > >>for historic reasons. > > > > > > > >For sure, I get that, but it doesn't mean we can't do-the-right-th= ing > > > >(tm) now does it? > > > > > > > >>Sure, we could have changed it to lowercase, but so far no one bo= thered. > > > >>Plus, of course, there is always the element that some maintainer= s hate > > > >>that kind of cleanup, > > > > > > > >Really? Surely any kind of clean-up is good clean-up. Especially= as > > > >Greg KH et. al, have been doing public presentations telling every= one > > > >that there is always kernel work for anyone who has the time; spel= ling > > > >corrections and all. > > > > > > >=20 > > > Yes, really. Just try to submit cleanup patches to maintainers othe= r than > > > Greg and myself, and you'll see. It is a minefield. > >=20 > > Admittedly some of us have our quirks, but I'm happy to challenge > > anyone that won't accept clean-up patches that make things better. > >=20 > There might possibly be a discussion at the kernel summit about that, > in the context of encouraging (or discouraging) new kernel developers. > If you are invited to the KS, it might make sense to attend that discus= sion. I'd be happy to, but I don't have any first-hand experience of these awkward (backward) Maintainers, who for some reason thing 'no change' ("don't touch it, it works"?) is better than 'improvement'.=20 If/when you come across it, a link would be appreciated. --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog"= in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html