From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:56927 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750857AbcCWWm2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 18:42:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:42:26 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Matthew McClintock Cc: andy.gross@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, qca-upstream.external@qca.qualcomm.com, Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , "open list:WATCHDOG DEVICE DRIVERS" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] watchdog: qcom: configure BARK time in addition to BITE time Message-ID: <20160323224226.GD18567@codeaurora.org> References: <1458770712-10880-1-git-send-email-mmcclint@codeaurora.org> <1458770712-10880-9-git-send-email-mmcclint@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1458770712-10880-9-git-send-email-mmcclint@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On 03/23, Matthew McClintock wrote: > For certain parts and some versions of TZ, TZ will reset the chip > when a BARK is triggered even though it was not configured here. So > by default let's configure this BARK time as well. > Why isn't TZ configuring the bark time to what it wants? I'm lost why we have to do this for them. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project