From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f182.google.com ([209.85.220.182]:33966 "EHLO mail-qk0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751785AbcGSWxe (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2016 18:53:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 18:53:27 -0400 From: Mahesh Khanwalkar To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: sudeep.dutt@intel.com, ashutosh.dixit@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, clemens@ladisch.de, wim@iguana.be, linux@roeck-us.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dasaratharaman.chandramouli@intel.com, timur@codeaurora.org, arnd@arndb.de, nab@linux-iscsi.org, hans.verkuil@cisco.com, mchehab@osg.samsung.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Documentation: Move samples from doc to samples/ Message-ID: <20160719225327.GA3779@gmail.com> References: <1468871700-12889-1-git-send-email-maheshkhanwalkar@gmail.com> <20160719163525.05af24af@lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160719163525.05af24af@lwn.net> Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 04:35:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > So, while I'm generally in favor of moving this code over to samples/, > I'm a bit nervous about a single, do-it-all patch. I'd rather see each > subsystem's stuff moved separately, with (1) review from the appropriate > maintainer, and (2) some sense that somebody has looked at this code and > ensured that it still makes sense to keep around. I agree. I'll break up the patch into smaller, independent pieces based on the subsystem and email the appropriate maintainers. There were a few other stuff referenced in Documentation/Makefile that may be samples (I'll have to look again) that I didn't add to the patch, as it was getting a quite large already. Thanks, Mahesh Khanwalkar