From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:17:33 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: fu.wei@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, marc.zyngier@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rruigrok@codeaurora.org, harba@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org, timur@codeaurora.org, graeme.gregory@linaro.org, al.stone@linaro.org, jcm@redhat.com, wei@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, leo.duran@amd.com, wim@iguana.be, linux@roeck-us.net, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, tn@semihalf.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org, julien.grall@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 0/9] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer Message-ID: <20161020151655.GA27598@leverpostej> References: <1475086637-1914-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <20161020143101.GI10234@leverpostej> <20161020145752.GC8731@red-moon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161020145752.GC8731@red-moon> List-ID: On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:57:52PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:31:01PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:08AM +0800, fu.wei@linaro.org wrote: > > > From: Fu Wei > > > > > This patchset depends on the following patchset: > > > [UPDATE PATCH V11 1/8] ACPI: I/O Remapping Table (IORT) initial support > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/12/949 > > > > Is there a branch with these anywhere? I wasn't Cc'd on those and it's > > rather difficult to get at the series from an LKML link. > > For the records, the dependency above has now been merged and it was > just a directory creation dependency (drivers/acpi/arm64, where some of > the code in this series will live). Ah, I see. That saves us all some trouble, then. :) Thanks, Mark.