* [PATCH] watchdog: f71808e_wdt: mark expected switch fall-throughs
@ 2017-11-02 19:28 Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-11-03 13:34 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2017-11-02 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wim Van Sebroeck, Guenter Roeck
Cc: linux-watchdog, linux-kernel, Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
"fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
index 8658dba..e0678c1 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static long watchdog_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
if (new_options & WDIOS_ENABLECARD)
return watchdog_start();
-
+ /* fall through */
case WDIOC_KEEPALIVE:
watchdog_keepalive();
@@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ static long watchdog_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
return -EINVAL;
watchdog_keepalive();
- /* Fall */
+ /* fall through */
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
return put_user(watchdog.timeout, uarg.i);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: watchdog: f71808e_wdt: mark expected switch fall-throughs
2017-11-02 19:28 [PATCH] watchdog: f71808e_wdt: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2017-11-03 13:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-11-03 14:44 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2017-11-03 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo A. R. Silva; +Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck, linux-watchdog, linux-kernel
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:28:17PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
> "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
> index 8658dba..e0678c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
> @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static long watchdog_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>
> if (new_options & WDIOS_ENABLECARD)
> return watchdog_start();
> -
> + /* fall through */
>
> case WDIOC_KEEPALIVE:
> watchdog_keepalive();
> @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ static long watchdog_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> watchdog_keepalive();
> - /* Fall */
> + /* fall through */
>
> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> return put_user(watchdog.timeout, uarg.i);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: watchdog: f71808e_wdt: mark expected switch fall-throughs
2017-11-03 13:34 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2017-11-03 14:44 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2017-11-03 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck, linux-watchdog, linux-kernel
Quoting Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:28:17PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
>> "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>
Thanks!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva
>> ---
>> drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
>> index 8658dba..e0678c1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c
>> @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static long watchdog_ioctl(struct file *file,
>> unsigned int cmd,
>>
>> if (new_options & WDIOS_ENABLECARD)
>> return watchdog_start();
>> -
>> + /* fall through */
>>
>> case WDIOC_KEEPALIVE:
>> watchdog_keepalive();
>> @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ static long watchdog_ioctl(struct file *file,
>> unsigned int cmd,
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> watchdog_keepalive();
>> - /* Fall */
>> + /* fall through */
>>
>> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
>> return put_user(watchdog.timeout, uarg.i);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-03 15:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-02 19:28 [PATCH] watchdog: f71808e_wdt: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-11-03 13:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-11-03 14:44 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox