From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-path: Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:30:16 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Srinath Mannam , wim@linux-watchdog.org, Ray Jui , Vladimir Olovyannikov , Vikram Prakash , Scott Branden , Sudeep Holla , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] watchdog: sp805: Add clock-frequency property Message-ID: <20180711153015.GA10578@e107155-lin> References: <1531212279-24953-1-git-send-email-srinath.mannam@broadcom.com> <20180710213557.GC27827@roeck-us.net> <3868f0c7-e45e-d3b4-5365-12a6a0646f6f@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3868f0c7-e45e-d3b4-5365-12a6a0646f6f@roeck-us.net> List-ID: On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 06:47:49AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 07/11/2018 06:22 AM, Srinath Mannam wrote: > >Hi Guenter, > > > >Thank you very much for all the help with your feedback and review > >comments to complete the changes very fast. > > > >About the documentation.. > >I have gone through few similar patches available in the kernel are > >listed in the mail of previous version. > >No documentation available in Linux for the properties used in those > >patches also. > > " No documentation available _in Linux_" > > Emphasis mine. Yes, I noticed this as well. I was asking for a reference > to documentation _outside_ Linux. Sorry for not being more specific. Typically new properties needs to registered or discussed in dsd@acpica.org Though there's almost no activity on that list for more than a year now. IIRC, the thread[1] gives kind of agreement that was reached after elaborate discussion on _DSD properties. -- Regards, Sudeep [1] https://lists.acpica.org/pipermail/dsd/2015-December/000027.html