From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Charles Haithcock" <chaithco@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Differentiate scenarios when watchdog is closed
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 21:52:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901215215.7D4E81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901214251.760184-1-chaithco@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] If `wdd->ops->stop()` fails, `WDOG_HW_RUNNING` is never restored, bypassing module unload protections and breaking fallback keepalive pings, leading to a Use-After-Free.
--
commit aaf821e8a7620610688b1a164fc083439874422c
Author: Charles Haithcock <chaithco@redhat.com>
watchdog: Differentiate scenarios when watchdog is closed
This patch adds an error message when the watchdog device fails to stop in
the device-specific code paths. This helps differentiate between scenarios
where the watchdog was intentionally left running (such as when nowayout is
set) versus when it simply failed to close.
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> index 9a5e544b886bf..6e3e437b7851f 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> @@ -305,6 +305,10 @@ static int watchdog_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> if (wdd->ops->stop) {
> clear_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING, &wdd->status);
> err = wdd->ops->stop(wdd);
> + if (err < 0) {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but if wdd->ops->stop() returns an error, is
WDOG_HW_RUNNING left incorrectly cleared?
It appears clear_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING, &wdd->status) is called before
wdd->ops->stop(). If the stop callback fails (e.g., an I2C failure in
drivers like ziirave), WDOG_HW_RUNNING remains cleared while WDOG_ACTIVE
remains set.
Could this bypass module unload protections and lead to a Use-After-Free?
If userspace closes the device and watchdog_stop() fails,
watchdog_release() will execute:
drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c:watchdog_release() {
...
if (err < 0) {
pr_crit("watchdog%d: watchdog did not stop!\n", wdd->id);
watchdog_ping(wdd);
}
...
}
Because WDOG_HW_RUNNING is cleared, watchdog_hw_running() evaluates to
false and the keepalive watchdog_ping() becomes a no-op.
Later in watchdog_release(), it evaluates:
drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c:watchdog_release() {
...
running = wdd && watchdog_hw_running(wdd);
mutex_unlock(&wd_data->lock);
if (!running) {
module_put(wd_data->cdev.owner);
put_device(&wd_data->dev);
}
...
}
Since running is false, it drops module references. This permits the
module to be unloaded and watchdog_core_data to be freed, but the
background worker watchdog_update_worker() remains active because
WDOG_ACTIVE is still set. Will this cause a kernel panic when the hrtimer
expires and accesses the freed struct or unloaded module?
> + pr_err("watchdog%d: Failed to stop watchdog: %pe\n", wdd->id,
> + ERR_PTR(err));
> + }
> trace_watchdog_stop(wdd, err);
> } else {
> set_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING, &wdd->status);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260901214251.760184-1-chaithco@redhat.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 21:42 [PATCH] watchdog: Differentiate scenarios when watchdog is closed Charles Haithcock
2026-09-01 21:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-01 23:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-09-04 20:03 ` chaithco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260901215215.7D4E81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=chaithco@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox