From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Triet Hoang" <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: npcm: Propagate errors from clock enable
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 09:39:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916093926.3D49D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916092753.187583-1-triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] watchdog: npcm: software timeout desync on start error causes unintended reset
- [High] watchdog: npcm: aborting restart handler on clock error hangs system reboot
--
commit cc8288f5db182802c807c8255052dea000706adb
Author: Triet Hoang <triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com>
watchdog: npcm: Propagate errors from clock enable
Check and propagate errors returned by clk_prepare_enable() when starting or
restarting the watchdog. Also propagate errors from npcm_wdt_start() through
npcm_wdt_set_timeout() and probe to prevent the driver from silently
continuing when the watchdog clock cannot be enabled.
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
> index 51348969bf492..0976a580b9f21 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
> @@ -149,8 +149,11 @@ static int npcm_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> {
> struct npcm_wdt *wdt = to_npcm_wdt(wdd);
> u32 val;
> + int err;
>
> - clk_prepare_enable(wdt->clk);
> + err = clk_prepare_enable(wdt->clk);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
>
> if (wdd->timeout < 2)
> val = 0x800;
[ ... ]
> @@ -216,7 +219,7 @@ static int npcm_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
> wdd->timeout = 2750;
>
> if (watchdog_active(wdd))
> - npcm_wdt_start(wdd);
> + return npcm_wdt_start(wdd);
[Severity: High]
Does returning an error here cause a state mismatch between software and
hardware?
Earlier in npcm_wdt_set_timeout(), wdd->timeout is modified before
npcm_wdt_start() is called:
if (timeout < 2)
wdd->timeout = 1;
else if (timeout < 3)
...
If npcm_wdt_start() returns the error from clk_prepare_enable(), the new
timeout value remains in wdd->timeout while the hardware continues running
with the old timeout.
The watchdog core's keepalive worker will recalculate the ping interval
using the new (potentially much longer) wdd->timeout. The hardware
watchdog, running with a shorter timeout, could then expire and
unexpectedly reset the system.
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -234,9 +237,12 @@ static int npcm_wdt_restart(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
> unsigned long action, void *data)
> {
> struct npcm_wdt *wdt = to_npcm_wdt(wdd);
> + int err;
>
> /* For reset, we start the WDT clock and leave it running. */
> - clk_prepare_enable(wdt->clk);
> + err = clk_prepare_enable(wdt->clk);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
[Severity: High]
Could returning an error here hang the system during reboot?
npcm_wdt_restart() is invoked via watchdog_restart_notifier() in the
watchdog core to handle system reboots. The watchdog core maps any non-zero
return from a restart handler to a notification value that aborts the
notifier chain.
This causes atomic_notifier_call_chain() to immediately break out of the
restart_handler_list loop in kernel/reboot.c.
As a result, not only does the NPCM watchdog skip its attempt to write to
the reset registers (which might succeed if the clock was already enabled),
but all lower-priority fallback restart handlers are preempted. The system
will hang indefinitely instead of rebooting.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260916092753.187583-1-triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 9:27 [PATCH] watchdog: npcm: Propagate errors from clock enable Triet Hoang
2026-09-16 9:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260916093926.3D49D1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=triet.hoang.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox