From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ea0-f173.google.com ([209.85.215.173]:52735 "EHLO
	mail-ea0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1758256Ab3FMTLG (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:11:06 -0400
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Tomasz Figa' <t.figa@samsung.com>,
	'Sylwester Nawrocki' <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	'Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner=27?= <heiko@sntech.de>,
	'Wim Van Sebroeck' <wim@iguana.be>,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, jhbird.choi@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Samsung watchdog support clean-up
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:11:03 +0200
Message-ID: <2600203.AqDGG2pvxF@flatron>
In-Reply-To: <0ee601ce65c1$673f2c90$35bd85b0$%kim@samsung.com>
References: <1368916627-23139-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com> <1449207.t4YSBOKy4W@amdc1227> <0ee601ce65c1$673f2c90$35bd85b0$%kim@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org

Hi Kukjin,

On Monday 10 of June 2013 19:00:57 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Hi Kukjin,
> > 
> > On Tuesday 04 of June 2013 18:37:54 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > Hi Sylwester, Kukjin,
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > > On Saturday 01 of June 2013 10:16:52 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > > > > Hi Tomasz,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On 05/19/2013 12:37 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > > > This series is aiming at cleaning up a bit watchdog support on
> > > > > > Samsung
> > > > > > SoCs. The patches tweak a bit all the watchdog handling code
> > > > > > here and
> > > > > > there, with the goal of making it DT- and
> > > > > > multiplatform-friendly.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > See particular patches for more detailed descriptions.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On S3C6410-based Tiny6410 board (Mini6410-compatible):
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Tested-by: Tomasz Figa<tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > I've tested this series on a s3c2440 based board. The system
> > > > > restart
> > > > > works fine.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Tested-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Thank you Sylwester for testing this series.
> > > 
> > > Thanks again :-)
> > > 
> > > > Kukjin, since it has been already tested on s3c24xx and s3c64xx
> > > > and nobody seems to care about s5p64x0 and s5pc100 (although I
> > > > don't see a reason why these patches should break them), could we
> > > > have this series applied?> > 
> > > OK, let me test this series on the smdk64x0 then, will apply.
> > > 
> > > If any problems, let you know.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for your gentle reminder.
> > 
> > Thank you for handling this. I have a lot of patches for S3C64xx
> > depending on this series queued in my private tree and it would be
> > really nice if I could finally get them merged for 3.11.
> 
> Applied, thanks.

Seems like this series got lost in action, as I don't see it in your tree. 
Is there any problem with it?

Best regards,
Tomasz