From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.active-venture.com ([67.228.131.205]:60530 "EHLO mail.active-venture.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755059Ab3JMS3P (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Oct 2013 14:29:15 -0400 Message-ID: <525AE675.1010606@roeck-us.net> Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:29:09 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wim Van Sebroeck CC: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , LKML , Linux Watchdog Mailing List , Maxime Ripard , Jingoo Han , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [GIT PULL REQUEST] watchdog - v3.12-rc4 Fixes References: <20131013180727.GN401@spo001.leaseweb.com> <525AE311.8060605@roeck-us.net> <20131013181933.GP401@spo001.leaseweb.com> In-Reply-To: <20131013181933.GP401@spo001.leaseweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On 10/13/2013 11:19 AM, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > Hi Guenter, > >> Looks like the diffs don't match the description. >> Are those possibly the diffs from your previous pull request ? > >>>From a 3.6 pull request to be precisely :-( I use the old mail > as template and apparently forgot to change the diff... > The correct diff here below. > I use a template and script to generate my pull request e-mails to avoid this kind of problem. This way worst that can happen is an unexpected "rcX" in the headline ... unless the pull request itself is screwed up, which I should hopefully notice before I send it out. Guenter