From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <53D95330.1050904@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:18:56 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guenter Roeck CC: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ingo Molnar , Russell King , Heiko Stuebner , Arnd Bergmann , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , Catalin Marinas , Tomasz Figa , Randy Dunlap , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , Jonas Jensen , Wim Van Sebroeck , Maxime Ripard , David Woodhouse , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] kernel: Add support for kernel restart handler call chain References: <1405668856-13738-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <1405668856-13738-2-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <1405668856-13738-2-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: On 07/18/14 00:34, Guenter Roeck wrote: > +/** > + * do_kernel_restart - Execute kernel restart handler call chain > + * > + * Calls functions registered with register_restart_handler. > + * > + * Expected to be called from machine_restart as last step of the restart > + * sequence. > + * > + * Restarts the system immediately if a restart handler function has been > + * registered. Otherwise does nothing. > + */ > +void do_kernel_restart(char *cmd) > +{ > + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&restart_handler_list, reboot_mode, cmd); > +} Has this been tested with scheduling while atomic checking (CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP) or lockdep (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)? ARM would call this with irqs disabled and blocking_notifier_call_chain() would spit out a warning when it tries to down_read() on it's semaphore. This should probably be an atomic notifier chain instead. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation