From: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Vipul Gandhi <vgandhi@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH] watchdog: introduce the ARM64 SBSA watchdog driver
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 08:16:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5544CE15.9050800@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55440CBD.6000504@roeck-us.net>
Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Even if you (and/or others) may personally believe that ACPI _is_ the
> center of the universe, please be open to the possibility that others
> may have a different opinion and/or different requirements. We should not
> have to completely rewrite the driver to add devicetree support later on.
There won't be any need to rewrite the driver to add device tree
support. All we need to do is add the device tree probe function.
> Note we still have to figure out how to instantiate the device based on
> the acpi data. I have no idea how that should be done, but it seems
> odd if it is really supposed to be done as you have implemented it.
> Maybe that is the case, but if so I would like to get a confirmation
> from an acpi maintainer.
Me too.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-02 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-29 19:33 [PATCH] watchdog: introduce the ARM64 SBSA watchdog driver Timur Tabi
2015-05-01 3:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-01 16:16 ` Timur Tabi
2015-05-01 17:28 ` Timur Tabi
2015-05-01 17:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-01 17:41 ` Timur Tabi
2015-05-01 17:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-01 18:46 ` Timur Tabi
2015-05-01 17:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-01 18:42 ` Timur Tabi
2015-05-01 19:24 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-01 19:56 ` Timur Tabi
2015-05-01 23:31 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-02 13:16 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2015-05-01 19:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-01 19:49 ` Timur Tabi
2015-05-01 19:19 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-01 20:15 ` Timur Tabi
2015-05-01 23:16 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-01 23:22 ` Timur Tabi
2015-05-01 23:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-01 13:09 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-05-02 13:55 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5544CE15.9050800@codeaurora.org \
--to=timur@codeaurora.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=vgandhi@codeaurora.org \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox