From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:35594 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030185AbbEONz3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 09:55:29 -0400 Message-ID: <5555FACD.6000408@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 08:55:25 -0500 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fu Wei , Guenter Roeck CC: Suravee Suthikulpanit , Linaro ACPI Mailman List , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Wei Fu , G Gregory , Al Stone , Hanjun Guo , Ashwin Chaugule , Arnd Bergmann , vgandhi@codeaurora.org, wim@iguana.be, Jon Masters , Leo Duran , Jon Corbet Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Watchdog: introdouce "pretimeout" into framework References: <=fu.wei@linaro.org> <1431689090-3125-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <5555F5C5.8050806@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Fu Wei wrote: >> >The new API function also needs to be documented in >> >Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-kernel-api.txt. > good point, thanks will do Yes, please, since my driver does not use or need any pre-timeout support, so I don't understand why this patch exists. What is pre-timeout anyway? -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.