public inbox for linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Timo Kokkonen <timo.kokkonen@offcode.fi>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] watchdog: Introduce WDOG_RUNNING flag
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 16:38:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CFCD72.3020304@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150814190403.GU9999@pengutronix.de>

On 08/14/2015 12:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Guenter,
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-kernel-api.txt b/Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-kernel-api.txt
>> index 25b00b878a7b..6a54dc15a556 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-kernel-api.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/watchdog/watchdog-kernel-api.txt
>> [...]
>> @@ -193,9 +194,12 @@ they are supported. These optional routines/operations are:
>>   The status bits should (preferably) be set with the set_bit and clear_bit alike
>>   bit-operations. The status bits that are defined are:
>>   * WDOG_ACTIVE: this status bit indicates whether or not a watchdog timer device
>> -  is active or not. When the watchdog is active after booting, then you should
>> -  set this status bit (Note: when you register the watchdog timer device with
>> -  this bit set, then opening /dev/watchdog will skip the start operation)
>> +  is active or not from user perspective. User space is expected to send
>> +  heartbeat requests to the driver while this flag is set. If the watchdog
>> +  is active after booting, and you don't want the infrastructure to send
>> +  heartbeats to the watchdog driver, then you should set this status bit.
>
> IMHO this should not be the driver author's choice! If you implement
> policy in the kernel it should at least be implemented in the framework
> and preferably easily changeable. (At least with Kconfig, but better use
> a kernel parameter (or both, the latter overriding the former).)
>
Agreed. I'll change that and simply drop that part. After all,
we now have WDOG_RUNNING to indicate that the watchdog is running.
I'll just have to make sure that there are no drivers which set
WDOG_ACTIVE at boot (afaics there are none).

>> +  Note: when you register the watchdog timer device with this bit set,
>> +  then opening /dev/watchdog will skip the start operation.
>>   * WDOG_DEV_OPEN: this status bit shows whether or not the watchdog device
>>     was opened via /dev/watchdog.
>>     (This bit should only be used by the WatchDog Timer Driver Core).
>> @@ -209,6 +213,11 @@ bit-operations. The status bits that are defined are:
>>     any watchdog_ops, so that you can be sure that no operations (other then
>>     unref) will get called after unregister, even if userspace still holds a
>>     reference to /dev/watchdog
>> +* WDOG_RUNNING: Set by the watchdog driver if the hardware watchdog is running.
>> +  The bit must be set if the watchdog timer hardware can not be stopped.
>> +  The bit may also be set if the watchdog timer is running aftyer booting,
>> +  before the watchdog device is opened. If set, the watchdog infrastructure
>> +  will send keepalives to the watchdog hardware while WDOG_ACTIVE is not set.
>>
>>     To set the WDOG_NO_WAY_OUT status bit (before registering your watchdog
>>     timer device) you can either:
>> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
>> index c04ba1a98cc8..676e233d5e7b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
>> @@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ static inline bool watchdog_need_worker(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>>   	unsigned int m = wdd->max_timeout * 1000;
>>   	unsigned int t = wdd->timeout * 1000;
>>
>> -	return watchdog_active(wdd) && hm && (!m || hm < m) && t > hm;
>> +	return (watchdog_active(wdd) && hm && (!m || hm < m) && t > hm) ||
>> +	       (t && !watchdog_active(wdd) && watchdog_running(wdd));
>
> What is the meaning of
>
> 	!t && !watchdog_active(wdd) && watchdog_running(wdd)
>
> ? Can this happen at all? If not, drop "t && "?
>
t can be 0, meaning "the watchdog timeout is unknown", unless a driver sets min_timeout
to a value larger than 0. Unfortunately, that is not explicitly specified.

Thanks,
Guenter


  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-15 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-08  5:02 [PATCH v2 0/8] watchdog: Add support for keepalives triggered by infrastructure Guenter Roeck
2015-08-08  5:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] watchdog: watchdog_dev: Use single variable name for struct watchdog_device Guenter Roeck
2015-08-08  5:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] watchdog: Introduce hardware maximum timeout in watchdog core Guenter Roeck
2015-08-13 21:13   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-15 23:17     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-14 11:23   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-15 23:21     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-08  5:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] watchdog: Introduce WDOG_RUNNING flag Guenter Roeck
2015-08-14 19:04   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-15 23:38     ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2015-08-08  5:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] watchdog: Make set_timeout function optional Guenter Roeck
2015-08-14 19:05   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-08-15 23:41     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-08-08  5:02 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] watchdog: imx2: Convert to use infrastructure triggered keepalives Guenter Roeck
2015-08-08  5:02 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] watchdog: retu: " Guenter Roeck
2015-08-08  5:02 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] watchdog: gpio_wdt: " Guenter Roeck
2015-08-08  5:02 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] watchdog: at91sam9: " Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55CFCD72.3020304@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=timo.kokkonen@offcode.fi \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox