From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:38638 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751237AbcA2Ags (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2016 19:36:48 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] Add sun4v_wdt watchdog driver To: Guenter Roeck , Julian Calaby References: <1454017572-5235-1-git-send-email-wim.coekaerts@oracle.com> <56AA9BDF.6070907@oracle.com> <56AAB157.3070809@roeck-us.net> Cc: wim@iguana.be, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux From: Wim Coekaerts Message-ID: <56AAB3EC.6070802@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:35:56 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56AAB157.3070809@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On 1/28/16 4:24 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 01/28/2016 02:53 PM, Wim Coekaerts wrote: >> On 01/28/2016 02:50 PM, Julian Calaby wrote: >>> Hi Wim, >>> >>> Sorry to keep iterating on this, but I noticed two small things you >>> could improve: >> >> yeah I was considering that although it makes the code a bit more >> readable but >> fine happy to tweak that. no problem. >> >> the static is definitely no longer needed after all the cleanup that >> happened. >> > > It would be great if you can drop the static. I'll leave the other one > for you > to decide; I was 50/50 on it myself. I don't have any further comments > (assuming > you ran the patch through checkpatch). > > Thanks, > Guenter > awesome I will drop the static. I did run through checkpatch. all good there :) I'll sleep on the value one. :) Thanks! Wim