From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:62527 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750921Ab2ITKTr (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:19:47 -0400 Received: by obbuo13 with SMTP id uo13so1280402obb.19 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:19:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120920100724.GF17667@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <1348055861-7857-1-git-send-email-fabio.porcedda@gmail.com> <1348055861-7857-3-git-send-email-fabio.porcedda@gmail.com> <20120920052928.GE17667@game.jcrosoft.org> <20120920100724.GF17667@game.jcrosoft.org> From: Fabio Porcedda Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:19:26 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: at91: add at91sam9_wdt driver to at91sam9260 To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Ferre , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Russell King Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 09:52 Thu 20 Sep , Fabio Porcedda wrote: >> Hi Jean-Christophe, >> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD >> wrote: >> > On 13:57 Wed 19 Sep , Fabio Porcedda wrote: >> >> Tested on an at91sam9260 board (evk-pro3) >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Fabio Porcedda >> >> --- >> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi | 6 ++++++ >> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi >> >> index 66389c1..680b1c8 100644 >> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi >> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi >> >> @@ -233,6 +233,12 @@ >> >> trigger-external; >> >> }; >> >> }; >> >> + >> >> + watchdog@fffffd40 { >> > disable dy default >> >> All the others watchdog drivers in arch/arm/boot/dts/* are enabled by default. >> IMHO the watchdog driver it's like the "rtstc" and "shdwc" driver, >> they are safe to be enabled by default. >> I'm missing something? > no the other watchdog will not reset if not managed > > this one will > > so I'm not confortable by enabling it by default Ok, i will send an updated patch. Thanks for the review -- Fabio Porcedda