From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B426133991 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2024 05:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728105813; cv=none; b=ReREg+s+iFzqtUlGnFyuaWX4kHd3kL1yxjRbyzPCtxSXTbwM09Ui88aDCNOLgBX5wZy7ux9e1dcnrcHQyi+PRGbhkuncz0fnjr9J0JgZ3onsaPopbVRyqVb50x5ViaLm1Acla5W3LnDzePsDePuN52NO1oQ1Xfj62zZ3dv7wB2E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728105813; c=relaxed/simple; bh=X+ta/FjiQIn6B3rd5Toivd0nVfLbmtxqSlFZCe82hqI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IfWo77metDGUPx0irHPtVs9K2/mrslh74JU/uX7A5Q7IhIatDz6ItfEPVVaiT05dOzGmLBPLeUY7Uk7cRihpdK92K97a48PtjM4FSILbPymVsY2C62rxWzjpFdX+nQx23Dc+4VgaU/LzAo7g2nE0IvL3zsODJB/jS6p+xcxoDYE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=lJoY6Zn8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="lJoY6Zn8" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=i/G/ nfWcYVPe+IQeC4sULDvoPUYhTOwvzFh1cg28cXo=; b=lJoY6Zn8mvkA4E2TEd3R Cl40TRFnOP08274eSaiJj7DITCsoJH7N5QLTx8lInfxLPuiePUFkiwlA97KurWyP hiCocp/9W0RsySdM9mqSqLLijxpvxXFOp/QxvsBkSVSQxpkHMlAROVm7CwJwqBta tIUBKwoxT+lE4ZgXPC7a6U7X5qlqtpT8uyY9NRyJV+34CH31Xb+pa4ChLQ3Sg+Hs QpCpXu/Lnu8SzSgJ5/Zxvu1CzNfalkXZLyOipUJvu1sCPADOf/mEFfyOdoPk8mqy sJtboSxEq3gCEqXvnK/p1hvmmzjQPFdPUENQQlF32UyuBAS820iZVM7GdR6Z24a7 cQ== Received: (qmail 3672784 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2024 07:23:24 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 5 Oct 2024 07:23:24 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@GK2c/LMj3KpQvCeD Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 07:23:19 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Jerry Hoemann Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Jean-Marie Verdun , Nick Hawkins , Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] watchdog: hpe-wdt: don't print out if registering watchdog fails Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Jerry Hoemann , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Jean-Marie Verdun , Nick Hawkins , Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org References: <20241004200314.5459-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20241004200314.5459-4-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AXghRCVBWp2XDeJH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --AXghRCVBWp2XDeJH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 03:29:09PM -0600, Jerry Hoemann wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 10:03:06PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > The core will do this already. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > --- > > drivers/watchdog/gxp-wdt.c | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) >=20 > Question: should email have been titled > "watchdog: gxp-wdt: ..." > instead of > "watchdog: hpe-wdt: ..." >=20 > to match the module name as the email title gets put into > the git log for the file? No objection, we can do that. I check git-log for the prefixes and found there the following: 6b47441bed49 ("watchdog: hpe-wdt: Introduce HPE GXP Watchdog") I am fine with both. --AXghRCVBWp2XDeJH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmcAzTwACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYivhAAsYGJiUz4EJue7VM/zt9VeJp7omXpYipxpqBIA74GYGjfXx0no7tm8Hck P7+tWV07GVuHt+PrMQPpdkbmmWg6EBzqTiARlDDfzNiyVkEDeX7BV6qT8XyhUjG9 gT90thBKUGH9LEeomP1eNar2IlxVTJgpVGBi1QGLz+aczYvKNzyqLJkn7BlFYGCn HYTgWoYIpk2yyjveK9pdkGSmeAS345XRdIfh+ZDqZ7N8wQ5zSJXi1v3sDHObt8/d MzpI+gDZD+UYS4/B4zZltAumwzgQig2XkhIKF53y60pP6x3SL6F/OyWyaHkqS1fn +16Ofy84XrX5GP3atpBEjXBlqaHlZGT9S+xb7uLnsU5Nzy46T3mugeRAlRw+MDWe xdGw24AFury3bNkfC1GnjzDNraROH2Tal0n1/t90jW+62UGrUaIYYgaajC5x4Alb KLUB/yrYTrYPszPgGilFEa1WpM+xFQuVaNMr4V0JcSspbWvCCxmuh9Dg2ahDgYSQ NBgPppmFYw4o1FHwuxiGWdIokX67fWu8U27R4ElRna9LG1NS9VUSeZPF393YggX2 mNXeF6546xPSq7SBUu0Tk45OMk3V5uRsMJhFCi2NdyG64apPWfByGy1q44Bh6Y8f Y7N1lfGTzuBtFXGTbgiWQE1tt9c/XFWfobPk8gqGzAOrd2SJMXg= =slor -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AXghRCVBWp2XDeJH--