From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:59662 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752895AbbH0NlW (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:41:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:40:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Hanjun Guo cc: Fu Wei , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Linaro ACPI Mailman List , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Wei Fu , G Gregory , Al Stone , Arnd Bergmann , Guenter Roeck , Vipul Gandhi , Wim Van Sebroeck , Jon Masters , Leo Duran , Jonathan Corbet , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Rafael Wysocki , dyoung@redhat.com, panand@redhat.com, Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] clocksource: simplify ACPI code in arm_arch_timer.c In-Reply-To: <55DF1257.9090303@linaro.org> Message-ID: References: <=fu.wei@linaro.org> <1440435683-7343-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <1440435683-7343-9-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <55DEFC54.4090904@linaro.org> <55DF025F.2050102@linaro.org> <55DF1257.9090303@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/29/236 > > > > If that is ok with you, we will introduce similar DECLARE_ thing > > for clock declare. Yes. > Or we can drop this patch from this patch set, and clean up this > patch when the ACPI_DECLARE() infrastructure is ready for upstream. Works either way. I just noticed that hard coded init thing and decided to rant about it :) Thanks, tglx