From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: wim@linux-watchdog.org, linux@roeck-us.net, rafael@kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, geert+renesas@glider.be,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Power on the PM domain in rzg2l_wdt_restart()
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 14:05:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c854caf4-5de4-42ab-b119-2a6e7fe0c511@tuxon.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFq1EX1Spedhkek=50EdwmHY5erNTmvegVGbxfLzTqYjEA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Ulf,
Sorry for the late reply, I was off last week.
On 13.08.2024 16:56, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 14:09, Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> wrote:
>>
>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>>
>> The rzg2l_wdt_restart() is called in atomic context. Calling
>> pm_runtime_{get_sync, resume_and_get}() or any other runtime PM resume
>> APIs is not an option as it may lead to issues as described in commit
>> e4cf89596c1f ("watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Fix 'BUG: Invalid wait context'")
>> that removed the pm_runtime_get_sync() and enabled directly the clocks.
>>
>> Starting with RZ/G3S the watchdog could be part of its own
>> software-controlled power domain. In case the watchdog is not used the
>> power domain is off and accessing watchdog registers leads to aborts.
>>
>> To solve this, the patch powers on the power domain using
>> dev_pm_genpd_resume_restart_dev() API after enabling its clock. This is
>> not sleeping or taking any other locks as the watchdog power domain is not
>> registered with GENPD_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE flags.
>
> Would it be a problem to register the corresponding genpd using the
> GENPD_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE?
Should be no problem, AFIK.
>
> Assuming it wouldn't, it looks like we should be able to make the
> watchdog device irq-safe too, by calling pm_runtime_irq_safe() during
> ->probe().
>
> In that case it should be okay to call pm_runtime_get_sync() in atomic
> context, right?
Right! I registered the watchdog domain with GENPD_FLAG_IRQ_SAFE as well as
it's parent domain (the always-on domain) and all looks good. However I
need to run further testing to be sure nothing is broken.
Thank you,
Claudiu Beznea
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c
>> index 6e3d7512f38c..bbdbbaa7b82b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> #include <linux/reset.h>
>> #include <linux/units.h>
>> @@ -169,6 +170,17 @@ static int rzg2l_wdt_restart(struct watchdog_device *wdev,
>> clk_enable(priv->pclk);
>> clk_enable(priv->osc_clk);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * The device may be part of a power domain that is currently
>> + * powered off. We need to power it on before accessing registers.
>> + * We don't undo the dev_pm_genpd_resume_restart_dev() as the device
>> + * need to be on for the reboot to happen. Also, as we are in atomic
>> + * context here, there is no need to increment PM runtime usage counter
>> + * (to make sure pm_runtime_active() doesn't return wrong code).
>> + */
>> + if (!pm_runtime_active(wdev->parent))
>> + dev_pm_genpd_resume_restart_dev(wdev->parent);
>> +
>> if (priv->devtype == WDT_RZG2L) {
>> ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->rstc);
>> if (ret)
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-19 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-19 12:09 [PATCH RFC 0/3] watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Enable properly the watchdog clocks and power domain Claudiu
2024-06-19 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] pmdomain: core: Add a helper to power on the restart devices Claudiu
2024-06-19 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Keep the clocks prepared Claudiu
2024-06-20 15:31 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2024-06-21 6:16 ` claudiu beznea
2024-06-19 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Power on the PM domain in rzg2l_wdt_restart() Claudiu
2024-08-13 13:56 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-08-19 11:05 ` claudiu beznea [this message]
2024-08-07 11:21 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Enable properly the watchdog clocks and power domain claudiu beznea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c854caf4-5de4-42ab-b119-2a6e7fe0c511@tuxon.dev \
--to=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox