From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zhao Feng" <zhaofeng2@cmss.chinamobile.com>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: npcm: fix clock prepare leak when setting timeout on a running watchdog
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 07:18:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-204537@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109071004.1506-1-zhaofeng2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found no new issues
in this patch, but noticed 1 related pre-existing issue it does not
introduce:
- [High] watchdog: npcm: sleep in atomic context in npcm_wdt_restart()
[1]
--
commit 17842ca84b08ec6bbd438017f39f767a1910936b
Author: Zhao Feng <zhaofeng2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
watchdog: npcm: fix clock prepare leak when setting timeout on a running watchdog
This commit splits register programming out of npcm_wdt_start() into
__npcm_wdt_start() so that npcm_wdt_set_timeout() does not acquire an
extra clock reference when updating the timeout on an active watchdog.
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
> index 51348969bf492..31253fd7bad5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
> @@ -145,13 +145,11 @@ static int npcm_wdt_ping(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int npcm_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> +static void __npcm_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> {
> struct npcm_wdt *wdt = to_npcm_wdt(wdd);
> u32 val;
>
> - clk_prepare_enable(wdt->clk);
> -
> if (wdd->timeout < 2)
> val = 0x800;
> else if (wdd->timeout < 3)
> @@ -176,6 +174,15 @@ static int npcm_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> val |= NPCM_WTRE | NPCM_WTE | NPCM_WTR | NPCM_WTIE;
>
> writel(val, wdt->reg);
> +}
> +
> +static int npcm_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> +{
> + struct npcm_wdt *wdt = to_npcm_wdt(wdd);
> +
> + clk_prepare_enable(wdt->clk);
> +
> + __npcm_wdt_start(wdd);
>
> return 0;
> }
[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can npcm_wdt_restart()
sleep in atomic context when calling clk_prepare_enable(wdt->clk)
[1]?
drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c:npcm_wdt_restart() {
struct npcm_wdt *wdt = to_npcm_wdt(wdd);
/* For reset, we start the WDT clock and leave it running. */
clk_prepare_enable(wdt->clk);
...
}
do_kernel_restart() invokes restart handlers via
atomic_notifier_call_chain() under an RCU read lock, whereas
clk_prepare_enable() calls clk_prepare() and takes the sleeping
prepare_lock mutex. This triggers a scheduling-while-atomic bug and can
deadlock during reboot or panic recovery.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-d877d7dc-83e2-4c44-b88a-c3f7ea954cd4
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109071004.1506-1-zhaofeng2@cmss.chinamobile.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 7:10 [PATCH] watchdog: npcm: fix clock prepare leak when setting timeout on a running watchdog Zhao Feng
2026-11-09 7:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-09 23:09 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-204537@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zhaofeng2@cmss.chinamobile.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox