From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5D9C4338F for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 06:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DF560720 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 06:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234548AbhHLGmi (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 02:42:38 -0400 Received: from m43-7.mailgun.net ([69.72.43.7]:40803 "EHLO m43-7.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231253AbhHLGmi (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 02:42:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1628750528; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Message-ID: Date: Subject: In-Reply-To: References: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=ra0BXwoiZ00ktzsx5gh0Tm/Akz5ZQUafOLsEvx7Rd50=; b=mGD9zFZhPsV7IhNh+PlC1SUuVAUJK9L+5GwQgnU58c79xmPNP586YI3LSITtjSKjGdoZBIP4 IhCmLTWhMWWA3vxGJXJKfbzjiKyVriOUwWTMOj9O7XaHM0xM/YgO9YlLF90oTQehMewIFmpY D/4JEzvxFaZpmteP2YtmqFiakxE= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.43.7 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI3YTAwOSIsICJsaW51eC13aXJlbGVzc0B2Z2VyLmtlcm5lbC5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n04.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 6114c2b1b14e7e2ecbd15af9 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 06:41:53 GMT Sender: msinada=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E6256C433F1; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 06:41:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from MSINADA (unknown [98.45.135.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: msinada) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3263C433D3; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 06:41:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org C3263C433D3 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=msinada@codeaurora.org From: "Muna Sinada" To: "'Johannes Berg'" Cc: References: <1607468044-31789-1-git-send-email-msinada@codeaurora.org> <1607468044-31789-2-git-send-email-msinada@codeaurora.org> <0f45b43c5a2dd4d0d2839487540611994ec10feb.camel@sipsolutions.net> <000801d78e5b$55d46530$017d2f90$@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: Handling driver updated MU-EDCA params Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 23:41:50 -0700 Message-ID: <000001d78f45$2234ccc0$669e6640$@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQEnZdCLZBNC6EG9F8ZPYUSPl+pHHAHggUnZAb6IkuACh8h3ywEBKPMIrJZ+jNA= Content-Language: en-us Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hello Johannes, Please drop this patch. Thank you, Muna -----Original Message----- From: Johannes Berg Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2021 3:07 AM To: Muna Sinada Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: Handling driver updated MU-EDCA params On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 19:48 -0700, Muna Sinada wrote: > Hello Johannes, > > I saw on your review comment that this wrapper is not needed. I wanted > to confirm with you if it would be ok to call a cfg80211 API from a > mac80211 based driver, since that is what would be done if this > wrapper is removed. Yes, that's fine. > Additionally, another reason I have this wrapper is so I can place a > tracepoint. What are your thoughts about this? You already have a tracepoint on cfg80211, seems sufficient? johannes