From: "Jean-Pierre Tosoni" <jp.tosoni@acksys.fr>
To: "'Felix Fietkau'" <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC] mac80211: Use libnl-configurable values for retry counts
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:09:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003001ce730d$9a32e980$ce98bc80$@acksys.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51CB33D9.1070104@openwrt.org>
First, thanks for your prompt reply and for pointing out my mistakes.
> > Use wiphy->retry_short for management frames.
> > Use wiphy->retry_long for other frames.
> That seems a bit arbitrary.
Indeed.
Should I use the following?
retry_long for data frames subject to RTS
retry_short for all other frames.
That looks closer to the descriptions in 802.11-2012.
> > + mp->max_retry = hw->conf.long_frame_max_tx_count;
> minstrel_alloc is called at rate control init time. You're not making
> max_retry configurable here, it'll pick the default value of
> hw->conf.long_frame_max_tx_count and never update it again.
Is it OK if I replace max_retry with the config values in minstrel_rate_init
and minstrel_update_rates instead?
Then we can get rid of max_retry completely?
(Sorry, I got mixed in the never-ending sequence of callbacks :)
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/rc80211_minstrel.c
> b/net/mac80211/rc80211_minstrel.c
> > index ac7ef54..502d0c9 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/rc80211_minstrel.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/rc80211_minstrel.c
> > @@ -592,11 +592,7 @@ minstrel_alloc(
> > /* maximum time that the hw is allowed to stay in one MRR segment
*/
> > mp->segment_size = 6000;
> >
> > - if (hw->max_rate_tries > 0)
> > - mp->max_retry = hw->max_rate_tries;
> > - else
> > - /* safe default, does not necessarily have to match hw
properties */
> > - mp->max_retry = 7;
> > + mp->max_retry = hw->conf.long_frame_max_tx_count;>
> - Felix
Jean-Pierre
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-27 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-26 17:28 [RFC] mac80211: Use libnl-configurable values for retry counts Jean-Pierre Tosoni
2013-06-26 18:32 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-06-27 8:09 ` Jean-Pierre Tosoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003001ce730d$9a32e980$ce98bc80$@acksys.fr' \
--to=jp.tosoni@acksys.fr \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).