From: "voncken" <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr>
To: "'Michal Kazior'" <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: "'linux-wireless'" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: ath10k: What will happens when radar is detected ?
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:41:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01eb01d0660e$650becc0$2f23c640$@acksys.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQkJ2qYKMzWHaW2wTq1qhoDn=FYEU7Wgo+Jyevzi1bBDEA@mail.gmail.com>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Michal Kazior [mailto:michal.kazior@tieto.com]
> Envoyé : mardi 24 mars 2015 07:56
> À : Cedric VONCKEN
> Cc : linux-wireless
> Objet : Re: ath10k: What will happens when radar is detected ?
>
> On 23 March 2015 at 16:16, Cedric VONCKEN <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr>
> wrote:
> > In 802.11ac standard, it is possible to dynamically reduce the channel
> > width used.
> > My question is:
> > If I use a channel with 80 or 40 MHz width, what will happen
> > if I detect radar?
> > The ath10k card/driver reduces automatically the
> > channel width.
>
> Currently entire chandef occupied will be marked as unavailable and AP
> will stop/switch to a different non-overlapping chandef via CSA.
Thanks for your answer.
>
> I guess it should be possible to implement what you suggest, i.e.
> change only chandef width when radar is narrow and located at a suitable
> part of the chandef. This would require hw to be capable of detecting
> radar center freq and width accurately. I'm not sure if QCA988X is
> capable of that although firmware interface seems to be able to carry
> this kind of information already.
>
> I wonder why would you want this behaviour in the first place?
> Wouldn't this actually end up with having less bandwidth and lower
> throughput (which is already penalized when radar detection is active)?
In an industrial environment we prefer to reduce the throughput but keep the link without gap. I think it can be a parameter in AP software for example.
Cédric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-24 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-23 15:16 ath10k: What will happens when radar is detected ? Cedric VONCKEN
2015-03-24 6:56 ` Michal Kazior
2015-03-24 8:41 ` voncken [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01eb01d0660e$650becc0$2f23c640$@acksys.fr' \
--to=cedric.voncken@acksys.fr \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).