From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.31 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794062397; b=mG/4OuvTj4YMPVqwZdmZzcxFbf3LwgQBT009OoGb7ICdwrDkIZ0SAknE2XGirZDPUOzS vjNB38+7oopSbzjXqXIsPB74q9cg2p7wv1fA7oM4M6E9M07fjkjRV6RY83yrYVPlwfAeo Pfkf7DHD+W2qUTS5Un5Bs5x6e3pDYOnE8be+SPB8sEkdAm5GcDe+Rf6i5yL+ROe/QaZzw oaBRpiI1dc8hvVfZ/XrS191bhjKYgpxFTOy8FyOmKF5AoKlwSGuBcSOL82sDx5zS5K4Wh /5AgNW2rnZVjyS7J6vsx3IRl5nCaS010Gwg1gmJe1W6A6ubhI6xp0E7ya+Ey3ZKPF4g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794062397; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:MIME-Version:Date:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Message-ID:TLS-Required:Subject:To:Cc: In-Reply-To:References; bh=5o9OR9vCOWkeQWyrFZJU2J9tzLuFcs6IDbCOy/FMjlE=; b=XlbBtQbPHiutIM8cFRR9rYfEow0DWIZBsdQKT5nJ9+ICluQ08YrCgX5qsn56d3AIkOqf 7mdwUotLO/XJ/TK8ayPztR/2QVSlHwjNRUvMXu80K+XsSWS+9eEXWL4oIn9pVxUWdf+Nm W8mFSTBEvNkbVuO0grT/L8Lveo7iOrPeWboqLrkNIJGEh7HyMrGW+kmGNJ5xD+xG1k3Yd QUkPBlkWTyP+YkxjpD8BRi3HDqNSQXlu5JqhMKdurd2xwXy9w68d0lCqfD88WVGh9su0m 92sgBU/hsF0hbthPj0TdDZHNzSd5G35IlSPFcdcOm5j/GBQSzCkphGJih3FxJ8HfRlg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=L37HXPtI; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.31 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-31.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BF14608361C for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2026 14:39:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 1BF14608361C Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=L37HXPtI X-Envelope-To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=5o9OR9vCOWkeQWyrFZJU2J9tzLuFcs6IDbCOy/FMjlE=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1794062392; v=1; x=1794667192; b=L37HXPtIiQeaOd7BDvTb4NDCfJR2TKHuELskCH1zdkt70mPWtVFOFQ3in1wBOjL8WB0brus6 3Fr6jKx5ufTtNZs4JoKlBtFTQQaZhyi8ZrumOfyOq1IFiGPkjM7ZyCseHGNHY3gsZrq94emkdni SHv9Xl6dTbEh37YUXN2ympoQ= X-Envelope-To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 249577e5de7941ac; Sat, 07 Nov 2026 14:39:52 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 249577e5de7941ac X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2026 14:39:52 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Luka Gejak" Message-ID: <04acc13ca12b3b4c31f7e89c878b727741250258@linux.dev> TLS-Required: No Subject: Re: [PATCH rtw-next] wifi: rtw88: 8822c: fix out-of-bounds access in cck_pd_set To: "Zeshan Ahmed Nobin" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Ping-Ke Shih" In-Reply-To: <20261107124255.41144-1-zeshanahmednobin@gmail.com> References: <20261105113415.73184-1-zeshanahmednobin@gmail.com> <20261107124255.41144-1-zeshanahmednobin@gmail.com> November 7, 2026 at 1:42 PM, "Zeshan Ahmed Nobin" wrote: [ ... ] > So I'd like to keep this patch to bw only and drop the nrx part in v2. > The nrx case is worth its own fix. I'm happy to send a separate patch > for it (I could only test it on PCIe by forcing the value, not on a USB > device), unless you'd rather send it yourself since you found it. Sounds good to me. Please go ahead and send it whenever you have time. The USB device I have is an RTL8723DU, so I can't test that either. Forcing the value on PCIe seems fine to me. Maybe just note under the --- line that this is how it was tested. Best regards, Luka Gejak