From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 033E51BBBEE for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 06:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727764348; cv=none; b=n44WlUcwlcEUlwHPoGA8CuONyyb4lj1rgQ7/e8VbWloLQafZXHjiMO+Sj47BWbFsK1SZONrMz98qpjyha0vHC5t4SoeakKgbvYGWUzXOmAnNpvE8WGVMByglAbJKKhxgsntUUwJn58iTxx7TUQjD7NzA5Ruof1Geri+D9D5RNoA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727764348; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fOBAMPE2E0L5e0qcPlmXJIO+UucSSed3hXNvGmWiPqs=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=lceFsEcRawibB9MMXziMfuQ11qwfM47Y6zhMYllnaGA02akOnsMukxXlHg7duHpLEqkTSpq3Xb1vZyZTY3Q//klWt6erE/D7ulllKd1S4vMjlQDnoQzCxv7dRthaIaz8ERtse0i2O/FTFw6e9YTtIRLJV3BCTiNREmiDUgpSlbA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=aqMZtiIX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="aqMZtiIX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=fOBAMPE2E0L5e0qcPlmXJIO+UucSSed3hXNvGmWiPqs=; t=1727764347; x=1728973947; b=aqMZtiIX5JY4BzJRClZKD3cXrYp0lwlmkEWlpbKaoMz5sJD hUOxDSuJPdnKaSfGyOGQZOfyg8LYpWnVKbdosykF7xYX6QYW+NJjrAHcu/qJUpW8M4Rx40GKc3o7d JiObkOGE9Dbrpk4KzQxnPp19cjrf3WOnV61TF4qV7MDJM1Z2LCS+0ERJF4pOABtCf0mR/5a0MMMJ5 7h68Rj2Ha+MUrsIsb9uXV0g4/kT87qWpqNCTTEFAEjNLz7b32Ah0VK9mTIRir9TXCHS1kZcg+JsAn I53idRLlalNmAYOX/a2X6KCY1qC/ER6fYIyLNqUmCaq3HET7eo5mWMa5S9PowkPg==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1svWQp-0000000EdAy-2EKu; Tue, 01 Oct 2024 08:32:23 +0200 Message-ID: <06708838017266efd2351f0bda1bf01b0ee2bef9.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mac80211: fix assigning channel in activate links From: Johannes Berg To: Aditya Kumar Singh Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath12k@lists.infradead.org Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 08:32:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20241001041518.2236297-1-quic_adisi@quicinc.com> References: <20241001041518.2236297-1-quic_adisi@quicinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.4 (3.52.4-1.fc40) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Tue, 2024-10-01 at 09:45 +0530, Aditya Kumar Singh wrote: > The current flow in _ieee80211_set_active_links() does not align with the > operational requirements of drivers that groups multiple hardware > under a single wiphy. Btw, given that, I'd argue it's not really "fix ..." right now, since there's no such driver and no real bug? Dunno. But "fix" makes it sound like there's a bugfix, and it isn't now, it's just preparing for future ath12k compatibility. johannes