From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@broadcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>,
Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>,
brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: brcmf_txfinalize misses 802.1x packet leading to infinite WARNINGs
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:49:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f7765be-5a27-f5f6-3361-cfb976d674bc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4df2418354fdf7eb585a898bf12b19f@mail.gmail.com>
On 15 September 2016 at 11:20, Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@broadcom.com> wrote:
> Thank you for the extensive debugging. We are looking into this. Arend wrote
> yesterday to ask for detailed timing on wen eapol is inserted. We want this
> so we can increase the timeout. This is not a "nice" way to solve the
> problem, and it should be solved in firmware, but in the meanwhile we do
> want to increase timer, because we think that ampdu issues can rise at any
> given moment and even with changes/updates in firmware it might be necessary
> to increase timeout.
I'm kindly asking to keep replies in related threads :) I'm pretty sure above is
about problem described in "AMPDU stalls with brcmfmac4366b-pcie.bin triggering
WARNINGs".
> Second problem is harder, it is good to see that the frame gets returned to
> driver at some point. Our biggest worry is that a frame remains indefinitely
> in the firmware, but that appears not to be the case. Now why could this
> fail. There is one possible reason I found, and that is when a flowring is
> deleted while it holds the eapol, see flowring.c. It does not call the
> brcmf_txfinalize, but frees the packet directly. I think this is wrong but
> need to investigate this in more detail. In the meanwhile, if you keep doing
> tests I would like to ask you to add a WARN_ON() call to the function
> __brcmu_pkt_buf_free_skb where you print ***BUG*** so we know where the
> packet got freed from.
Please take a look at my e-mail & log (& maybe diff) once again. You really
quite missed the point.
The function brcmf_txfinalize *was* called. I was describing it in my e-mail
and there is a log:
[ 1440.414653] brcmfmac: [__brcmf_txfinalize -> __brcmu_pkt_buf_free_skb] [ifp:c72e7c80] ***BUG*** skb:c70ddc00 skb->dev:c72e7800 skb->dev->name:wlan1-1
Above means that brcmf_txfinalize was called for skb c70ddc00 and it called
brcmu_pkt_buf_free_skb.
My debugging code noticed that it wasn't alright as this packet was still
pending and pend_8021x_cnt wasn't decreased for him. Please note it was
brcmf_txfinalize's fault (which was called for 100% sure). For some reason it
didn't pass if (type == ETH_P_PAE) condition. I already described it and I
shared my guess of firmware corrupting skb data. I'm now using debugging patch
which prints copied and current content of skb data in case of fault.
You're right I should have used WARN in my ***BUG*** place. It's a stupid habit
from MIPS devices where backtraces aren't reliable. I printed mini call chain
on my own instead. I mean this part:
[__brcmf_txfinalize -> __brcmu_pkt_buf_free_skb]
So please take a look at my e-mail again and let me know if it makes more sense
now.
What do you think about my guess of firmware corrupting skb data?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-15 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-15 8:11 brcmf_txfinalize misses 802.1x packet leading to infinite WARNINGs Rafał Miłecki
2016-09-15 9:20 ` Hante Meuleman
2016-09-15 10:49 ` Rafał Miłecki [this message]
2016-09-20 11:16 ` Rafał Miłecki
2016-09-22 11:59 ` Rafał Miłecki
2016-09-22 12:24 ` Rafał Miłecki
2016-09-22 14:09 ` Rafał Miłecki
2016-09-23 6:48 ` Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f7765be-5a27-f5f6-3361-cfb976d674bc@gmail.com \
--to=zajec5@gmail.com \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=hante.meuleman@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meuleman@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox