Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Subject: SIOCSIWAP behavior question
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:47:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1175521655.9859.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)

Should setting a BSSID trigger a disconnection event from the driver?
Obviously a disconnect event shouldn't be triggered if the BSSID being
set is the same BSSID the card is already associated with.  Or does that
mean "reassociate unconditionally" ?

But suppose we have two APs in the same ESS with obviously different
BSSIDs.  The card automatically associates with one BSSID, but
wpa_supplicant decides it likes the other BSSID and calls SIOCSIWAP to
lock to that one during the association process.  Should the driver
issue an IWAP event of 00:00:00:00:00:00 before attempting
re-association with the BSSID that wpa_supplicant wants?

The libertas driver currently does this; it sometimes confuses
wpa_supplicant and is arguably wrong behavior because drivers don't
issue disconnection events when auto-roaming from BSSID to BSSID in the
same ESS.

Conversely, if you have two access points 'linksys' with different
BSSIDs that really _are_ two different ESSs, this would screw up
userspace tools if a disconnect _wasn't_ sent.  But in this case
automatic tools have more problems than driver events.

Thoughts?  I guess I vote for not sending disconnect events if that
BSSID has the same capabilities and the same SSID as the current
association BSS.

Dan



             reply	other threads:[~2007-04-02 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-02 13:47 Dan Williams [this message]
2007-04-02 13:55 ` SIOCSIWAP behavior question Dan Williams
2007-04-02 15:54 ` Jouni Malinen
2007-04-02 16:56   ` Joerg Mayer
2007-04-02 17:01     ` Jouni Malinen
2007-04-02 16:58 ` Johannes Berg
2007-04-02 19:19   ` Dan Williams
2007-04-03 11:47     ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1175521655.9859.15.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=dcbw@redhat.com \
    --cc=j@w1.fi \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox