From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:37948 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965390AbXIGNYs (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2007 09:24:48 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6.24] cfg80211: use idr layer for wiphy indizes From: Johannes Berg To: "John W. Linville" Cc: linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <1188480704.2963.41.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1188480704.2963.41.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1MdhsD7e72dkOYcj6/xl" Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 19:56:56 +0200 Message-Id: <1189101416.28781.115.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-1MdhsD7e72dkOYcj6/xl Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 15:31 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > This makes cfg80211 use the idr layer instead of keeping > an own list of registered devices. Hmm. Come to think of it, this is not good as it makes us reuse the wiphy numbers. Normally that would be fine, however, here it would probably be nicer for tools to know that a specific wiphy no longer exists when they have an old index. Please don't apply. I'll make a new patch to still keep a list but introduce the walking helper. johannes --=-1MdhsD7e72dkOYcj6/xl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBG4D9o/ETPhpq3jKURAofeAJ0YgfQtZBSUn8rUlXwskpEKK7sPqACcDray sGJCKzlTmTywwGI51j7NkO0= =aCWl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1MdhsD7e72dkOYcj6/xl--