From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move wlan_*_association_work from header to c file
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 09:20:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1194358856.12229.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711061351.14673.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 13:51 +0100, Holger Schurig wrote:
> > The 2nd patch "libertas: move to uniform lbs_/LBS_ namespace"
> > breaks the compile of if_sdio.c, so I had to drop it. I
> > dropped "libertas: clean up association debug messages" as
> > well.
>
> I didn't see an if_sdio.c in my tree when I made the patch.
>
> And I wont make a third patch. It's quite discouraging to send
> things which don't get applied (for no known reasons) for more
> than a week. And during that time they bitrot. Would the patch
> have been applied timely, it would have worked in the first
> place.
This is the way things work. The patch clearly was not material for
2.6.24 given the timing. Therefore, it's 2.6.25. Therefore, since
if_sdio.c was ready to go in _August_, it hit 2.6.24, but you didn't
have it because your patch was based on 2.6.23, not 2.6.24-rc1. That's
distributed development. If you want a feature, you have to keep coming
back until it gets where you need to go, if you want the benefits of
distributed development.
> Also, changing all things wlan_XXX in libertas_XXX is soooo easy.
> However, I won't do it. The one who originally asked for the
> cleanup patch should do the work and have the patience to get
> the patch through, I have real work to do.
In any case, thanks for the work. I'll see if I can pick it up.
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-06 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-11 9:51 [PATCH] move wlan_*_association_work from header to c file Holger Schurig
2007-10-11 11:05 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-11 12:57 ` John W. Linville
2007-10-11 14:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-10-11 14:50 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-15 7:18 ` Holger Schurig
[not found] ` <200710151247.31049.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
2007-10-15 10:58 ` [PATCH] libertas: move to uniform lbs_/LBS_ namespace Holger Schurig
2007-10-15 11:07 ` Holger Schurig
2007-10-15 11:21 ` Johannes Berg
2007-10-15 12:26 ` Holger Schurig
2007-10-15 14:13 ` [PATCH] move wlan_*_association_work from header to c file Dan Williams
2007-10-15 14:28 ` Holger Schurig
2007-10-15 14:42 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-15 14:49 ` Holger Schurig
2007-10-15 16:43 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-22 17:20 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-25 8:37 ` Holger Schurig
2007-10-25 13:55 ` Dan Williams
2007-10-26 11:43 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-06 1:16 ` John W. Linville
2007-11-06 12:51 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-06 14:20 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2007-10-22 17:17 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1194358856.12229.3.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
--cc=libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).