From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] less eventcause shifts
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:22:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1196263365.28264.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711281613.51463.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 16:13 +0100, Holger Schurig wrote:
> > s/less/fewer/ of course :)
>
> Thanks. Should I re-submit?
>
>
> > Since I'm also going to be sending a flurry of libertas
> > patches and the turnaround through the wireless tree seems
> > suboptimal, shall we put up a git tree and work on it
> > together, then ask John to pull when we're done?
>
> That might be an option. Currently, I'm working with
> wireless-2.6/everything and quilt (because it's faster then
> stgit).
>
> My goal with libertas is better roaming in an STA+MANY APs
> scenario. Right now libertas is almost unusable for my usage
> work type. The new-scan patch is just a stepstone in this
> direction (so that I understand scanning much better). Also my
> janitor-like patches are just by-products of getting used to the
> code-base.
>
> In what parts of libertas are you working?
He's reworking the firmware command handling to not be quite as sucky
and obfuscated. It's gonna be a big patch.
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-28 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-28 8:15 [PATCH] less eventcause shifts Holger Schurig
2007-11-28 14:53 ` Dan Williams
2007-11-28 15:02 ` David Woodhouse
2007-11-28 15:13 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-28 15:22 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2007-11-28 16:29 ` David Woodhouse
2007-11-29 9:32 ` Holger Schurig
2007-11-28 15:21 ` Dan Williams
2007-12-03 17:58 ` Dan Williams
2007-12-03 20:48 ` David Woodhouse
2007-12-03 21:17 ` Dan Williams
2007-12-04 14:54 ` John W. Linville
2007-12-04 15:07 ` David Woodhouse
2007-12-04 15:06 ` Dan Williams
2007-12-04 15:21 ` David Woodhouse
2007-12-04 15:11 ` David Woodhouse
2007-12-04 15:21 ` John W. Linville
2007-12-04 15:29 ` David Woodhouse
2007-12-04 16:00 ` Dan Williams
2007-12-04 16:14 ` John W. Linville
2007-12-04 16:17 ` Dan Williams
2007-12-04 16:12 ` John W. Linville
2007-12-04 16:27 ` [PATCH] fewer " David Woodhouse
2007-12-04 16:57 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1196263365.28264.33.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
--cc=libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).