From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:35033 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751684AbXLESNN (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:13:13 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] libertas: allow easier command playing From: David Woodhouse To: Dan Williams Cc: Holger Schurig , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org In-Reply-To: <1196874408.12263.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200712051757.52053.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> <1196874408.12263.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:13:02 +0000 Message-Id: <1196878382.13978.472.camel@pmac.infradead.org> (sfid-20071205_181319_085719_3C152D68) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 12:06 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > Yeah; need to get this figured out with David; he'll probably start > yelling loudly if these get acked. He might be committing/reverting > locally and just not pushing up to libertas-2.6 until he's ready. > However, he did promise something by Friday. I'd almost say push your > patches to libertas-2.6 and let Woodhouse handle the merge work when > he pulls from the repo, but he'll probably have a better idea. Just committing to the git tree as if we were kernel developers works for me for now. If we have to abandon git and start playing patchmonkey again later, I suppose I'll have to deal with that pain then. -- dwmw2