From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:35176 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753611AbXLGSFN (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 13:05:13 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] libertas: implement new scanning logic From: Dan Williams To: Holger Schurig Cc: libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: <200712071547.37944.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> References: <200711290927.15915.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> <1196787130.4772.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200712071547.37944.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:57:43 -0500 Message-Id: <1197050263.30465.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> (sfid-20071207_180519_021917_BCA724D2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:47 +0100, Holger Schurig wrote: > > So I tested this one, not the one from libertas-dev (which was > > posted a day earlier). And this one seems fine. Ack for > > commit to libertas-2.6. > > > > Would you like me to confirm on SDIO? > > I now commit that to libertas-2.6, even without your > SDIO-testing. Yeah, go ahead. I got distracted because of changes in > 2.6.23 kernels that cause the driver not to build there, and haven't chased them down yet. Dan