linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mattias Nissler <mattias.nissler@gmx.de>
To: Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@polimi.it>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC/T][PATCH 2/3] rc80211-pid: introduce PID sharpening factor
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:53:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1197244416.7543.27.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071210003120.0078db1d@morte>


On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 00:31 +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:29:21 +0100
> Mattias Nissler <mattias.nissler@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> > Note that current rate_control_pid_sample() is only called from
> > rate_control_pid_tx_status(), which does an tx_num_xmit++ in advance. So
> > the tx_num_xmit branch should actually never be executed (I kept it only
> > to guard against any division by zero errors).
> 
> Eek? Removing the misleading comment would have been nice...

Indeed. I'll amend it :-)

> where does
> interpolation occur now? I got a bit confused by this.

There is no interpolation so far :-) Rate control isn't called
periodically, but only when tx status reports come in. Therefore,
currently we have fixed interval sampling only when packets are sent at
a high enough rate, i.e. 1 packet per second. I'd like to keep it that
way, so we save the timer and don't have to worry about synchronization.
I guess you rather want to base your sharpening patch on the jiffies -
last_sample difference. If it's to much, there haven't been many packets
recently. This will also work when rate control is started, cause
last_sample == 0 then.

Mattias


  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-09 23:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-09 20:15 [RFC/T][PATCH 0/3] rc80211-pid: PID controller enhancements Stefano Brivio
2007-12-09 20:19 ` [RFC/T][PATCH 1/3] rc80211-pid: introduce rate behaviour learning algorithm Stefano Brivio
2007-12-09 22:25   ` Mattias Nissler
2007-12-09 23:21     ` Stefano Brivio
2007-12-10  0:17       ` Stefano Brivio
2007-12-10  2:24       ` [RFC/T][PATCH v2 " Stefano Brivio
2007-12-10  6:51         ` Mattias Nissler
2007-12-10  7:23           ` Stefano Brivio
2007-12-11 23:29           ` [RFC/T][PATCH v3 " Stefano Brivio
2007-12-12  0:25             ` [RFC/T][PATCH v4 " Stefano Brivio
2007-12-10  6:48       ` [RFC/T][PATCH " Mattias Nissler
2007-12-10  8:03         ` Stefano Brivio
2007-12-10 20:48           ` Mattias Nissler
2007-12-10 20:56           ` Mattias Nissler
2007-12-10 21:30             ` Stefano Brivio
2007-12-10 22:05               ` Mattias Nissler
2007-12-10  8:08     ` Stefano Brivio
2007-12-10 20:51       ` Mattias Nissler
2007-12-10 21:22         ` Stefano Brivio
2007-12-10 21:31           ` st3
2007-12-10 22:09           ` Mattias Nissler
2007-12-11 14:52         ` Johannes Berg
2007-12-11 17:23           ` Mattias Nissler
2007-12-12 17:13             ` Johannes Berg
2007-12-12 20:06               ` Mattias Nissler
2007-12-12 21:34                 ` Stefano Brivio
2007-12-13 11:42                 ` Johannes Berg
2007-12-14  5:27                   ` Jouni Malinen
2007-12-14 12:09                     ` Johannes Berg
2007-12-13  8:00             ` Holger Schurig
2007-12-11 14:51       ` Johannes Berg
2007-12-09 20:21 ` [RFC/T][PATCH 2/3] rc80211-pid: introduce PID sharpening factor Stefano Brivio
2007-12-09 22:29   ` Mattias Nissler
2007-12-09 23:31     ` Stefano Brivio
2007-12-09 23:53       ` Mattias Nissler [this message]
2007-12-10  2:28         ` [RFC/T][PATCH v2 " Stefano Brivio
2007-12-10  6:28           ` Mattias Nissler
2007-12-10  7:21             ` Stefano Brivio
2007-12-10  7:44               ` Mattias Nissler
2007-12-10  8:17                 ` Stefano Brivio
2007-12-11 23:31                 ` [RFC/T][PATCH v3 " Stefano Brivio
2007-12-09 20:28 ` [RFC/T][PATCH 3/3] rc80211-pid: allow for parameters to be set through sysfs Stefano Brivio
2007-12-09 22:30   ` Mattias Nissler
2007-12-10  2:31     ` [RFC/T][PATCH v2 " Stefano Brivio
2007-12-16  9:40   ` [RFC/T][PATCH " Stefano Brivio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1197244416.7543.27.camel@localhost \
    --to=mattias.nissler@gmx.de \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=stefano.brivio@polimi.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).