linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hostap@lists.infradead.org" <hostap@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Question on setting key right after the EAPOL 4/4 is sent.
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 18:36:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11de85e9-6028-e2f8-376b-3188ff1b95a5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4982156c-5325-8021-dcd3-f13e02c63c72@candelatech.com>

Hi Ben,

> The problem I see is that sometimes (and quite often when I am using lots
> of vdevs and thus the NIC is busy), the keys are set before the EAPOL 4/4
> hits the air.  When the key is set, the NIC will no longer transmit the
> frame because of key-length issues in the tx-descriptor (ath10k wave-2
> in this case).

We have encountered something similar.  In our case we were seeing PAE 
packets (e.g. 4WayHandshake packet 1 of 4) before seeing the connect 
events on nl80211.

> I suspect that there is a fundamental race between the EAPOL packet-tx
> logic and the key-set logic, but supplicant appears to act as though
> they are natually synchronized.

Fundamentally there is a race between the genl/nl80211 socket to the 
kernel and the PAE socket that handles the authentication aspects.  I 
think the only way to fix this is to make sure that PAE flows over the 
genl/nl80211 socket to preserve the proper order of events.  However 
there are lots of dragons in the kernel side of this and we haven't been 
brave enough to venture into the depths yet :)

Regards,
-Denis

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-08 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-08 23:17 Question on setting key right after the EAPOL 4/4 is sent Ben Greear
2017-06-08 23:36 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2017-06-08 23:43   ` Ben Greear
2017-06-09  0:07     ` Denis Kenzior
2017-06-09  7:28       ` Johannes Berg
2017-06-09 13:10         ` Denis Kenzior
2017-06-09 19:56           ` Johannes Berg
2017-06-09 21:42             ` LINKMODE & OPERSTATE thoughts Denis Kenzior
2017-06-13  9:15               ` Johannes Berg
2017-06-09 13:46         ` Question on setting key right after the EAPOL 4/4 is sent Ben Greear
2017-06-09 20:01           ` Johannes Berg
2017-06-09 20:18             ` Ben Greear
2017-06-09 21:47               ` Janusz Dziedzic
2017-06-09 22:02                 ` Ben Greear
     [not found]                   ` <CADP2NhbXgHWo+BWhrKQndu5X7fzd2J9teqf-o6fSWwDMv8X5Hw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-06-10 16:01                     ` Ben Greear
2017-06-10 19:13               ` Arend van Spriel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11de85e9-6028-e2f8-376b-3188ff1b95a5@gmail.com \
    --to=denkenz@gmail.com \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=hostap@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).