Re: wireless mini-summit agenda proposals?

[Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 20:29 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 2:42 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> >
> > > cfg80211/nl80211 - overview, get Johannes to disseminate knowledge
> > > because email isn't optimal for this.  I haven't had enough time to jump
> > > into it yet, but the fact that Johannes is the vast majority of the
> > > effort here is worrisome.  Having a reference implementation (airo,
> > > atmel, maybe libertas) of a fullmac driver ported to cfg80211 would
> > > probably be very useful, even just to get a sense of how the API works.
> >
> > cfg80211/nl80211 is no further for fullmac drivers than a year ago, all
> > work it got so far is for hostapd.
> >
> > I have a fairly decent plan how to add association/... support but it
> > lacks execution because it's completely boring work that doesn't buy us
> > any new features since we still have to support wext.
> >
> Security setting is a bit  broken. There is a missing separation
> between static and dynamic./WPA wep keys.

How do you mean?

Dan

> > > 802.11n - do we need any discussion here or is it just a question of
> > > executing on the current plan?
> 
> > I think with the last patchset from Ron it's mostly done, cleanups still
> > to do and probably QoS improvements (I'm thinking multiqueue netdevs
> > here)
> 
> Multiqueue  and  AP mode support is planed. AP mode requires changes
> in configuration interface (cfg, wext) and hostapd.
> 
> > > Userspace MLME - what's going on here?  Noise around this seems to be
> > > quieter these days.  Is stuff going according to plan/schedule or are
> > > there roadblocks?
> >
> > Nobody is working on this, but a good part is done since hostapd works
> > and the userspace MLME needs many of the same features. Again, the
> > biggest thing is cfg80211/nl80211 support, setting a device to userspace
> > MLME mode and implementing the communication.
> >
> > johannes
> >