From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:39785 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752064AbYBUTYx (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:24:53 -0500 Subject: blockack sessions vs. sta removal From: Johannes Berg To: Ron Rindjunsky Cc: linux-wireless Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vwxWWAm/y0c0Ff7ZKzu4" Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:17:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1203603463.4462.1.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20080221_192506_247976_9BB07AC6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-vwxWWAm/y0c0Ff7ZKzu4 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ron, I was looking through some kernel oops with removing a driver (unregister_hw()) while an AP is active and noticed that we don't clean up, i.e. call ieee80211_sta_stop_rx_ba_session(), when a sta structure is deleted. I think that's a bug. johannes --=-vwxWWAm/y0c0Ff7ZKzu4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIVAwUAR72IBqVg1VMiehFYAQIpjA//YytMIBalo1pvZSPhPFZuqkw3KNWTIyEY WxovRUlSzDuu/M8zSU1fdqPM3QGiU4l6gQRN5WJSrYWxyY2b2eBNeo/nn8Ma58IG aNu5se2V9b8srmenZfm4+WeD0gmsGSkBoSn3RAuAOV+cnVYiEr0j7GaNvqo+zqEc BsIORlEjMKAJfwpD8JUdGIRAG4q6/hVruY+rCSpo+QSx3QWb8dQ1SSTbTPRLPJn1 m9xeFcetFG1WxyHMnMyHuRbHJTJE/1vazLBOBHbFylHFZJ7fpPpfWxjKtLsbiy9+ Vfz74aWG/h5xLVA3dUurH6YGYJo5EsBZuUIfhJ+VgDyjI8pKDaXhXvaKDQ5/uUb7 aVu0EcPZStXx4e5oGSxTAq/EnnCnLzG1ql+g3FyiR5wiObxPl9+QhrIDL+YKo+q6 F7Yada0oHiLgUn4T2LdUTjHIgTnP5+zR7t4L4zdX1s/ENITAjVq0VhWVlJfbAIsQ 4WNfzUjuJNLfYV8K/ry4yWCI7aKUnTYsLj3M1kDUXeJjUV8VKSDPKU94RFKU2M9v XRU3AxOKkeYgJLXn010Srp34x0CJFvU5bNOtv7DTNUGpEUgbkiPjC2ASyBe+jlcz m2UeKfSOmpGsKbPtWiLve6I3tAXYAXAQgoQ3qKWxAzfx6J/+d6zLXiJJMBZ+U6m+ 0T6lNWaZK5g= =dYCL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vwxWWAm/y0c0Ff7ZKzu4--