linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Luis Carlos Cobo <luisca@cozybit.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@polimi.it>,
	Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13 v2] o11s: mesh interface support for mac80211
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:50:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1203969040.13162.145.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1203968745.6929.30.camel@localhost> (sfid-20080225_194425_609760_1B1ADCFD)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1021 bytes --]


> > >  - We no longer use directly rtnetlink for mesh peer link and mesh paths
> > >    operation, and use nl80211 instead.
> > 
> > Nice too. What does libertas currently do btw?
> > 
> 
> iwpriv...

eww, ok. Guess we can convert that, CC Dan & David.

> > > I would like to point out that it looks like we can get duplicate sta_entries,
> > > or more entries than the maximum allowed, if stas are added at the same time
> > > through normal network behavior and manual operation through nl80211. Please
> > > correct me if I am wrong or if it is just that no interface type is supposed to
> > > allow both kinds of additions.
> > 
> > I think I CC'ed you on the patch fixing that, no?
> 
> Not sure which patch are you talking about, anyway I will check that
> along with the mesh + sta_info changes testing.

Subject was "mac80211: atomically check whether STA exists already"

It didn't check the number of STAs since I thought adding one per CPU
more wouldn't hurt too much ;)

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-25 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-22  4:05 [PATCH 00/13 v2] o11s: mesh interface support for mac80211 Luis Carlos Cobo
2008-02-22 15:21 ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-22 15:59   ` John W. Linville
2008-02-22 16:34   ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-23 10:58     ` Johannes Berg
2008-02-25 19:47     ` Luis Carlos Cobo
2008-02-25 19:45   ` Luis Carlos Cobo
2008-02-25 19:50     ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2008-02-26  1:03       ` David Woodhouse
2008-02-26  8:22         ` Johannes Berg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-22  4:05 Luis Carlos Cobo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1203969040.13162.145.camel@johannes.berg \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luisca@cozybit.com \
    --cc=stefano.brivio@polimi.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).