Patch for linux wireless extension

Patch for linux wireless extension

[hce]

Hi,

I am running a wifi device on kernel 2.6.11 and wireless extension
version 17 for an ARM processor, it works fine with an open AP and
wpa_supplicant 0.5.8. Now I would like to support WEP and WPA. I know
the best is to upgrade to latest kernel, but I am not in the position
to do it as various reasons. An alternative as people suggested is to
do a wireless extension patch which supports WEP and WPA on kernel
2.6.11. Any advice if it is feasible and where can I find the wireless
extension patch for WEP and WPA on kernel 2.6.11 please?

Thank you.

Kind Regards,

Jim

Re: Patch for linux wireless extension

[Johannes Berg]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 737 bytes --]

Jim,

> I am running a wifi device on kernel 2.6.11 and wireless extension
> version 17 for an ARM processor, it works fine with an open AP and
> wpa_supplicant 0.5.8. 

That's ancient.

> Now I would like to support WEP and WPA. I know
> the best is to upgrade to latest kernel, but I am not in the position
> to do it as various reasons. 

Upgrade anyway.

> An alternative as people suggested is to
> do a wireless extension patch which supports WEP and WPA on kernel
> 2.6.11. Any advice if it is feasible and where can I find the wireless
> extension patch for WEP and WPA on kernel 2.6.11 please?

Hahaha. We'll you'll have to *make* that patch and invest a
*significant* amount of time into that.

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

Re: Patch for linux wireless extension

[Dan Williams]

On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 11:26 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Jim,
> 
> > I am running a wifi device on kernel 2.6.11 and wireless extension
> > version 17 for an ARM processor, it works fine with an open AP and
> > wpa_supplicant 0.5.8. 
> 
> That's ancient.
> 
> > Now I would like to support WEP and WPA. I know
> > the best is to upgrade to latest kernel, but I am not in the position
> > to do it as various reasons. 
> 
> Upgrade anyway.
> 
> > An alternative as people suggested is to
> > do a wireless extension patch which supports WEP and WPA on kernel
> > 2.6.11. Any advice if it is feasible and where can I find the wireless
> > extension patch for WEP and WPA on kernel 2.6.11 please?
> 
> Hahaha. We'll you'll have to *make* that patch and invest a
> *significant* amount of time into that.

Yeah; it's not just the defines and whatnot in wireless.h; you probably
also want to update wireless-tools too, then you have to update your
driver as well.  It's not hugely complex, but it's going to be a lot of
boring work :)

Dan

Re: Patch for linux wireless extension

[hce]

On 3/5/08, Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 11:26 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>  > Jim,
>  >
>  > > I am running a wifi device on kernel 2.6.11 and wireless extension
>  > > version 17 for an ARM processor, it works fine with an open AP and
>  > > wpa_supplicant 0.5.8.
>  >
>  > That's ancient.
>  >
>  > > Now I would like to support WEP and WPA. I know
>  > > the best is to upgrade to latest kernel, but I am not in the position
>  > > to do it as various reasons.
>  >
>  > Upgrade anyway.
>  >
>  > > An alternative as people suggested is to
>  > > do a wireless extension patch which supports WEP and WPA on kernel
>  > > 2.6.11. Any advice if it is feasible and where can I find the wireless
>  > > extension patch for WEP and WPA on kernel 2.6.11 please?
>  >
>  > Hahaha. We'll you'll have to *make* that patch and invest a
>  > *significant* amount of time into that.
>
>
> Yeah; it's not just the defines and whatnot in wireless.h; you probably
>  also want to update wireless-tools too, then you have to update your
>  driver as well.  It's not hugely complex, but it's going to be a lot of
>  boring work :)
>
>
>  Dan

I've just upgrade wireless extension version 18 which supports WPA (Is
it for WEP as well?), with replaced two files of version 18 wireless.h
and wireless.c in the kernel 2.6.11. Please correct me if I missed
other source files in the kernel.

The wireless-tools we are using come from different sources, the
iwconfig was from busybox 1.3 and wpa_supplicant 0.5.8 was compiled to
our firmware. The initial test for WEP set up was not good, but I was
told, the wireless extension vresion 18 only supports WPA not WEP,
please advice.

Thank you.

Kind Regards,

Jim

Re: Patch for linux wireless extension

[Dan Williams]

On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 21:37 +1100, hce wrote:
> On 3/5/08, Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 11:26 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >  > Jim,
> >  >
> >  > > I am running a wifi device on kernel 2.6.11 and wireless extension
> >  > > version 17 for an ARM processor, it works fine with an open AP and
> >  > > wpa_supplicant 0.5.8.
> >  >
> >  > That's ancient.
> >  >
> >  > > Now I would like to support WEP and WPA. I know
> >  > > the best is to upgrade to latest kernel, but I am not in the position
> >  > > to do it as various reasons.
> >  >
> >  > Upgrade anyway.
> >  >
> >  > > An alternative as people suggested is to
> >  > > do a wireless extension patch which supports WEP and WPA on kernel
> >  > > 2.6.11. Any advice if it is feasible and where can I find the wireless
> >  > > extension patch for WEP and WPA on kernel 2.6.11 please?
> >  >
> >  > Hahaha. We'll you'll have to *make* that patch and invest a
> >  > *significant* amount of time into that.
> >
> >
> > Yeah; it's not just the defines and whatnot in wireless.h; you probably
> >  also want to update wireless-tools too, then you have to update your
> >  driver as well.  It's not hugely complex, but it's going to be a lot of
> >  boring work :)
> >
> >
> >  Dan
> 
> I've just upgrade wireless extension version 18 which supports WPA (Is
> it for WEP as well?), with replaced two files of version 18 wireless.h
> and wireless.c in the kernel 2.6.11. Please correct me if I missed
> other source files in the kernel.
> 
> The wireless-tools we are using come from different sources, the
> iwconfig was from busybox 1.3 and wpa_supplicant 0.5.8 was compiled to
> our firmware. The initial test for WEP set up was not good, but I was
> told, the wireless extension vresion 18 only supports WPA not WEP,
> please advice.

Incorrect.  WE-18 _added_ support for WPA ioctls but did not remove
support for WEP.  You'll just have to debug stuff and find out what's
going wrong.

dan

Re: Patch for linux wireless extension

[hce]

On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 21:37 +1100, hce wrote:
>  > On 3/5/08, Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> wrote:
>  > > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 11:26 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>  > >  > Jim,
>  > >  >
>  > >  > > I am running a wifi device on kernel 2.6.11 and wireless extension
>  > >  > > version 17 for an ARM processor, it works fine with an open AP and
>  > >  > > wpa_supplicant 0.5.8.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > That's ancient.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > > Now I would like to support WEP and WPA. I know
>  > >  > > the best is to upgrade to latest kernel, but I am not in the position
>  > >  > > to do it as various reasons.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Upgrade anyway.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > > An alternative as people suggested is to
>  > >  > > do a wireless extension patch which supports WEP and WPA on kernel
>  > >  > > 2.6.11. Any advice if it is feasible and where can I find the wireless
>  > >  > > extension patch for WEP and WPA on kernel 2.6.11 please?
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Hahaha. We'll you'll have to *make* that patch and invest a
>  > >  > *significant* amount of time into that.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Yeah; it's not just the defines and whatnot in wireless.h; you probably
>  > >  also want to update wireless-tools too, then you have to update your
>  > >  driver as well.  It's not hugely complex, but it's going to be a lot of
>  > >  boring work :)
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  Dan
>  >
>  > I've just upgrade wireless extension version 18 which supports WPA (Is
>  > it for WEP as well?), with replaced two files of version 18 wireless.h
>  > and wireless.c in the kernel 2.6.11. Please correct me if I missed
>  > other source files in the kernel.
>  >
>  > The wireless-tools we are using come from different sources, the
>  > iwconfig was from busybox 1.3 and wpa_supplicant 0.5.8 was compiled to
>  > our firmware. The initial test for WEP set up was not good, but I was
>  > told, the wireless extension vresion 18 only supports WPA not WEP,
>  > please advice.
>
>  Incorrect.  WE-18 _added_ support for WPA ioctls but did not remove
>  support for WEP.  You'll just have to debug stuff and find out what's
>  going wrong.

Thanks Dan.

There was an error of "ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Input/output error". I
looked at wireless.h and wireless.c of WE18, that the
"SIOCSIWENCODEEXT" is defined and it also defines following in the
static const struct iw_ioctl_description standard_ioctl[]

[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT - SIOCIWFIRST] = {
        .header_type    = IW_HEADER_TYPE_POINT,
        .token_size = 1,
        .min_tokens = sizeof(struct iw_encode_ext),
        .max_tokens = sizeof(struct iw_encode_ext) +
                IW_ENCODING_TOKEN_MAX,
    },

What could I be missing for that ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT] in the kernel?

Thank you Dan.

Kind Regards,

Jim

Re: Patch for linux wireless extension

[Dan Williams]

On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 14:00 +1100, hce wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 21:37 +1100, hce wrote:
> >  > On 3/5/08, Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> wrote:
> >  > > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 11:26 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >  > >  > Jim,
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > > I am running a wifi device on kernel 2.6.11 and wireless extension
> >  > >  > > version 17 for an ARM processor, it works fine with an open AP and
> >  > >  > > wpa_supplicant 0.5.8.
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > That's ancient.
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > > Now I would like to support WEP and WPA. I know
> >  > >  > > the best is to upgrade to latest kernel, but I am not in the position
> >  > >  > > to do it as various reasons.
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > Upgrade anyway.
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > > An alternative as people suggested is to
> >  > >  > > do a wireless extension patch which supports WEP and WPA on kernel
> >  > >  > > 2.6.11. Any advice if it is feasible and where can I find the wireless
> >  > >  > > extension patch for WEP and WPA on kernel 2.6.11 please?
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > Hahaha. We'll you'll have to *make* that patch and invest a
> >  > >  > *significant* amount of time into that.
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > Yeah; it's not just the defines and whatnot in wireless.h; you probably
> >  > >  also want to update wireless-tools too, then you have to update your
> >  > >  driver as well.  It's not hugely complex, but it's going to be a lot of
> >  > >  boring work :)
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >  Dan
> >  >
> >  > I've just upgrade wireless extension version 18 which supports WPA (Is
> >  > it for WEP as well?), with replaced two files of version 18 wireless.h
> >  > and wireless.c in the kernel 2.6.11. Please correct me if I missed
> >  > other source files in the kernel.
> >  >
> >  > The wireless-tools we are using come from different sources, the
> >  > iwconfig was from busybox 1.3 and wpa_supplicant 0.5.8 was compiled to
> >  > our firmware. The initial test for WEP set up was not good, but I was
> >  > told, the wireless extension vresion 18 only supports WPA not WEP,
> >  > please advice.
> >
> >  Incorrect.  WE-18 _added_ support for WPA ioctls but did not remove
> >  support for WEP.  You'll just have to debug stuff and find out what's
> >  going wrong.
> 
> Thanks Dan.
> 
> There was an error of "ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Input/output error". I
> looked at wireless.h and wireless.c of WE18, that the
> "SIOCSIWENCODEEXT" is defined and it also defines following in the
> static const struct iw_ioctl_description standard_ioctl[]
> 
> [SIOCSIWENCODEEXT - SIOCIWFIRST] = {
>         .header_type    = IW_HEADER_TYPE_POINT,
>         .token_size = 1,
>         .min_tokens = sizeof(struct iw_encode_ext),
>         .max_tokens = sizeof(struct iw_encode_ext) +
>                 IW_ENCODING_TOKEN_MAX,
>     },
> 
> What could I be missing for that ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT] in the kernel?

Well, if you want to support WPA you _also_ have to update your driver
with the ENCODEEXT and AUTH calls, and have your driver deliver WPA and
RSN IEs in the scan results with the GENIE tag.

There might also be something wrong with the backport, the IO error
reported looks odd.  I'm not an expert on the implementation of WEXT in
wireless.c though and I'm unsure what the exact path is that the ioctl
takes before it gets to the driver :(

Dan