Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Cc: Ron Rindjunsky <ron.rindjunsky@intel.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mac80211: holding sta_info for non associated stations
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:08:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207127331.10910.2.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240804011419l1b825c7cnd02790257af9112c@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080401_221920_584454_405C87BE)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1458 bytes --]


> >  > If i associate to a random AP "x" (what happened automatically as i
> >  > was configured by ifup scripts to do that), and then scan and
> >  > associate to my desired AP "y", i notice that AP "x" was not removed
> >  > from the mac80211 station table. Then, what happened was that during
> >  > ieee80211_stop, when we reach
> >  >
> >  > list_for_each_entry_rcu(sta, &local->sta_list, list) {
> >  >     if (sta->sdata == sdata)
> >  >     ieee80211_sta_tear_down_BA_sessions(dev, sta->addr);
> >  > }
> >  >
> >  > we try to tear down sessions to irrelevant stations (AP "x" in my
> >  > example), which leads to bugs.
> >
> >  Why would that lead to bugs? That station was known, and there are no
> >  sessions for that AP.
> 
> It's like freeing twice the same a pointer. On what level will you
> check that there are no BA session with this ghost  AP?

I don't see the problem. BA sessions are per-STA-info, so what's the
problem with having a STA-info linger around a bit longer maybe?

> >  There might be a problem in that we forget to remove that AP under some
> >  circumstances but it shouldn't matter, we always can have multiple
> >  stations in our table.
> 
> Not in STA mode, should be associated only to one AP at a time. (Hope
> this also cover roaming).

True, but BA sessions ought to also work in AP mode and I don't see
where the code differs.

Maybe I misunderstood the problem?

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2008-04-02  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-31 14:46 mac80211: holding sta_info for non associated stations Ron Rindjunsky
2008-04-01 12:28 ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-01 21:19   ` Tomas Winkler
2008-04-02  9:08     ` Johannes Berg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1207127331.10910.2.camel@johannes.berg \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=ron.rindjunsky@intel.com \
    --cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox