From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Cc: Ron Rindjunsky <ron.rindjunsky@intel.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mac80211: holding sta_info for non associated stations
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:08:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207127331.10910.2.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240804011419l1b825c7cnd02790257af9112c@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080401_221920_584454_405C87BE)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1458 bytes --]
> > > If i associate to a random AP "x" (what happened automatically as i
> > > was configured by ifup scripts to do that), and then scan and
> > > associate to my desired AP "y", i notice that AP "x" was not removed
> > > from the mac80211 station table. Then, what happened was that during
> > > ieee80211_stop, when we reach
> > >
> > > list_for_each_entry_rcu(sta, &local->sta_list, list) {
> > > if (sta->sdata == sdata)
> > > ieee80211_sta_tear_down_BA_sessions(dev, sta->addr);
> > > }
> > >
> > > we try to tear down sessions to irrelevant stations (AP "x" in my
> > > example), which leads to bugs.
> >
> > Why would that lead to bugs? That station was known, and there are no
> > sessions for that AP.
>
> It's like freeing twice the same a pointer. On what level will you
> check that there are no BA session with this ghost AP?
I don't see the problem. BA sessions are per-STA-info, so what's the
problem with having a STA-info linger around a bit longer maybe?
> > There might be a problem in that we forget to remove that AP under some
> > circumstances but it shouldn't matter, we always can have multiple
> > stations in our table.
>
> Not in STA mode, should be associated only to one AP at a time. (Hope
> this also cover roaming).
True, but BA sessions ought to also work in AP mode and I don't see
where the code differs.
Maybe I misunderstood the problem?
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-02 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-31 14:46 mac80211: holding sta_info for non associated stations Ron Rindjunsky
2008-04-01 12:28 ` Johannes Berg
2008-04-01 21:19 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-04-02 9:08 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1207127331.10910.2.camel@johannes.berg \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=ron.rindjunsky@intel.com \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox