Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
Cc: David Anders <dave123_aml@yahoo.com>,
	libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, "Harvey,
	Timothy" <tharvey@irobot.com>,
	feng.tang@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	claud_yu <claud_yu@yahoo.com.tw>
Subject: Re: Alternative Libertas SDIO driver seen
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:12:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1208193149.31015.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804141831.34183.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>

On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 18:31 +0200, Holger Schurig wrote:
> > the moblin libertas driver is originally based on source
> > marvell released for both the OLPC and the UMPC
> 
> I understand the history similar to this:
> 
>    Marvell driver developed driver
>         dropped to OLPC
>    Marvell continued internal driver
>         Linux community used OLPC driver and
>         brought it into a linux mainline acceptable form
>    Marvell released 5.0.16 as GPL
>         OLPC driver was massaged to support
>         USB,CF and somwhat to support SDIO
>    Marvell continued internal driver
>         Linux community changed OLPC driver
>    Marvell released v8 to Intel moblinux
>    Marvell continued internal driver
>         Linux community changed OLPC driver
>    Marvell releases v9 to Intel moblinux
> 
> 
> From some perspective, I find the current libertas driver in 
> Linux better (Dan Williams wrote about this).
> 
> However, I'd like to compare an early OLPC driver to the v9 that 
> is in Intel's moblinux tree. This way we can find out what 
> Marvell changed in the meantime and decide which of those 
> changes might be beneficial for us.

WMM and BT coexistance are two big ones so far.

For your reviewing pleasure, from the latest 8686 drop on the Marvell
site against the early 8388 drop on their site, which is essentially
what they tossed over the wall to OLPC in April 2006:

http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/lbs-drivers.diff

Dan



  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-14 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <252063.3227.qm@web72209.mail.tp2.yahoo.com>
2008-04-14 10:11 ` Alternative Libertas SDIO driver seen Holger Schurig
2008-04-14 13:39   ` David Anders
2008-04-14 16:31     ` Holger Schurig
2008-04-14 17:12       ` Dan Williams [this message]
2008-04-14 15:19   ` Dan Williams
2008-04-15  2:05     ` Tang, Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1208193149.31015.58.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=dcbw@redhat.com \
    --cc=claud_yu@yahoo.com.tw \
    --cc=dave123_aml@yahoo.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
    --cc=libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tharvey@irobot.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox