From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:36948 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751999AbYEHP2k (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 May 2008 11:28:40 -0400 Subject: Re: 015-mac80211-tx-info-skb-cb.patch From: Johannes Berg To: Ivo van Doorn Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200805081734.23354.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (sfid-20080508_172446_517725_0910B37D) References: <200805081503.41025.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <200805081710.03869.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <1210259130.3547.59.camel@johannes.berg> <200805081734.23354.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (sfid-20080508_172446_517725_0910B37D) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MLW79PZ48PsCfwG6aM/k" Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 17:28:29 +0200 Message-Id: <1210260509.3547.62.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20080508_172739_477509_2264D61F) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-MLW79PZ48PsCfwG6aM/k Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 17:34 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > On Thursday 08 May 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: > >=20 > > > > Right :) I'm pretty much done with the skb->cb conversion too excep= t for > > > > ath5k (nick) and rt2x00 (you) > > >=20 > > > I'm going to rebase rt2x00.git this weekend to update from wireless-t= esting, > > > since the skb->cb patches now depends on HW crypto which is not ready > > > for upstream yet, I am going to reverse the patch order so the skb->c= b patches > > > and some other updates can go upstream more easily. > >=20 > > Cool, thanks. If you have a single patch that can pretty much go into > > wireless-testing you can send it to me and I'll roll it into my patch. >=20 > Well at the moment I have it split into 2 patches, one that is only > preperation work by splitting a particular function to guarentee the skb-= >cb > rules are being followed. And the second patch is the actual conversion. > Those 2 can easily be merged into a single patch which you can roll into = your > patch. Whatever you like better. Maybe it's easier to follow the code/patch flow if your preparation patch goes in first on its own? johannes --=-MLW79PZ48PsCfwG6aM/k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIVAwUASCMcHKVg1VMiehFYAQJu5RAAuhNo2K7Nk2J0yI1atjjXNbF10hDGkhdN 31dv9zsxPDTzr5fYRSP5g2LDrUWPx1H6KsyZ7OqIDncodyUMbueDixp9d4dcPwHC mfjnjb1fU8MIDZWidUEdk7h2vikv6kOdq0PQb6yXMy5mdCK1hWECmAdtvz+bzpBv OWnfZuWFHnHB39bJAWjuIzbr18oszb/b4GFRP9rDXA2y8Vpc+NOl3+BUZgOgEKa6 5uOkcmZGMn77AuDDOvJJnQCrnX9H8lgG5AMI99MN9o6GkVZb9hQ/cJMY0oKp0aqc uoPrEfXUcUHQj1gtyZ3NoMKHPXYRrhMOYno66GaEETnpEx7fz6brtjAPxmLM9hyn Re8ohou/33YxIkP35qWbl9WyQybcsy0++eN3IkhbckMFkL7f0SeK7bpPiNuFi0Nx 93g15NrNQJ2mn98PXLVSb5YH3YaZFOoUYt56kQySkvCClj80FMM57/ZZJm1NROXs vhORBfy6fXGf6Wny2pL6t5swlDFdA/1/7dNscdfogBUTO2Y8tadgSVPvMPSdSZLO 7vHPwwTJZCy/isN809dFXrzK+Me3fUqp0KXtTxEuGkDW21PkyVIqrIEHyq3qmAE8 yXkH1ttYEOf/2zk7NOth5lKiLXo+IF4Z3RKOhvU89RzjWhBV8gxiuVU5fMjO17Ac AcdzONWzMUg= =yM+q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MLW79PZ48PsCfwG6aM/k--