From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, John W Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] hostap: remove private "monitor" ioctl
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:30:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1211981429.31989.29.camel@dv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080526094406.GI4932@jm.kir.nu>
On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 12:44 +0300, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:54:54PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > This is an ioctl obsoleted by the monitor mode years ago. Using it
> > would trigger a deprecation warning. As the wireless drivers
> > standardize on the radiotap standard, the "monitor" ioctl cannot be
> > preserved to work as obsolete software expects.
>
> I don't follow the login here... Why "cannot be preserved"? I might go
> with "we do not want to preserve this", but I do not see any technical
> reason that would prevent us from supporting existing user space
> interface that has been used in the past and may still be in use.
The old ioctl was supporting bare 802.11, prism and AVS headers. I want
to replace all three of them with radiotap. I had to leave bare 802.11
support for the AP interface (wlan0ap) for hostapd compatibility, but
the main interface should only support radiotap.
Suppose we want to support the old ioctl. All three types of headers
that could be requested are going away now. Can we expect the software
that doesn't know of "iwconfig mode monitor" to know radiotap headers?
I don't think so.
> Since
> this may break existing user space programs, I do not think this should
> go in. Obviously, same goes for removal of the actual use of this
> parameter and support for different header formats in patch 5/5. Adding
> support for radiotap format is of course reasonable, but I would be more
> careful with removing existing functionality which may still be in use.
OK, if that's what you prefer, I can do it.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-28 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-23 1:54 [PATCH 1/5] hostap: fix sparse warnings Pavel Roskin
2008-05-23 1:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] hostap: fix references to 8802.11 Pavel Roskin
2008-05-26 9:38 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-05-23 1:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] hostap: remove private "monitor" ioctl Pavel Roskin
2008-05-26 9:44 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-05-28 13:30 ` Pavel Roskin [this message]
2008-05-28 14:48 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-05-23 1:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] hostap: don't report useless WDS frames by default Pavel Roskin
2008-05-23 1:55 ` [PATCH 5/5] hostap: add radiotap support, always use it in monitor mode Pavel Roskin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1211981429.31989.29.camel@dv \
--to=proski@gnu.org \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).