linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Cc: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] mac80211: make ieee80211_get_hdrlen_from_skb return unsigned
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:24:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1212805460.6340.91.camel@brick> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1212783357.29134.5.camel@dv>

On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 16:15 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 11:47 -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
>=20
> > unlikely() isn't some magic make-me-faster function, it just moves =
code
> > to the end of the function to get it out of the icache and jumps to=
 it
> > in the unlikely case it is taken.  When all there is is a return, I
> > don't think it even makes any difference.  In both these cases a co=
mment
> > is probably more appropriate.
>=20
> If we don't more return to the end, we get something like:
>=20
> compare skb->len to 10
> if more or equal goto 1
> return
> 1: <the likely case>
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFI don't know much about modern processor design, but I remem=
ber reading
> that even a very short jump would flush the instruction pipeline and
> cause some delay.
>=20
> I would keep unlikely() and let the compiler think what to do with it=
=2E
>=20

On X86-32 at least the generated code is exactly the same with or
without the unlikely()s.  I'll put them back in a follow-on if people
are really attached to them.

Harvey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles=
s" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-07  2:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-06 17:51 [PATCH 4/7] mac80211: make ieee80211_get_hdrlen_from_skb return unsigned Harvey Harrison
2008-06-06 18:24 ` Michael Buesch
2008-06-06 18:47   ` Harvey Harrison
2008-06-06 20:15     ` Pavel Roskin
2008-06-07  2:24       ` Harvey Harrison [this message]
2008-06-09  9:15         ` Johannes Berg
2008-06-09 16:25           ` Harvey Harrison

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1212805460.6340.91.camel@brick \
    --to=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=proski@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).