linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iw lockdep warning on wireless-testing
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:05:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1214298350.14590.238.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1214297955.8967.258.camel@johannes.berg>

On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 10:59 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> > 2.6.26-rc6-wl #57
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > iw/2763 is trying to acquire lock:
> >  (genl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff81216e4c>] ctrl_dumpfamily
> +0x31/0xf7
> > 
> > but task is already holding lock:
> >  (nlk->cb_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff812137c8>] netlink_dump
> +0x40/0x19d
> > 
> > which lock already depends on the new lock.
> 
> None of those is anything nl80211 has influence over, afaict.

Agreed. I can follow the two scenarios below. Apparently it's a ABBA
locking issue. Just don't know which should be the correct sequence for
using with the two locks.

Thanks,
-yi

> > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> > 
> > -> #1 (nlk->cb_mutex){--..}:
> >        [<ffffffff810518cb>] __lock_acquire+0xa4c/0xc28
> >        [<ffffffff81215774>] netlink_dump_start+0xd9/0x169
> >        [<ffffffff81051e5d>] lock_acquire+0x51/0x6c
> >        [<ffffffff81215774>] netlink_dump_start+0xd9/0x169
> >        [<ffffffff8104eab1>] debug_mutex_lock_common+0x16/0x23
> >        [<ffffffff8127c622>] mutex_lock_nested+0xde/0x23f
> >        [<ffffffff81215774>] netlink_dump_start+0xd9/0x169
> >        [<ffffffff81216d7e>] genl_rcv_msg+0xae/0x14b
> >        [<ffffffff8127c774>] mutex_lock_nested+0x230/0x23f
> >        [<ffffffff81216cd0>] genl_rcv_msg+0x0/0x14b
> >        [<ffffffff8121483a>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x34/0x7c
> >        [<ffffffff81216fe1>] genl_rcv+0x21/0x30
> >        [<ffffffff812145ec>] netlink_unicast+0x1f7/0x287
> >        [<ffffffff811f7eb7>] __alloc_skb+0x84/0x132
> >        [<ffffffff81214d60>] netlink_sendmsg+0x274/0x287
> >        [<ffffffff811f1b49>] sock_sendmsg+0xe2/0xff
> >        [<ffffffff8104582f>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
> >        [<ffffffff81050878>] mark_held_locks+0x49/0x67
> >        [<ffffffff811f1d7d>] sys_sendmsg+0x217/0x28a
> >        [<ffffffff8107de49>] __do_fault+0x35d/0x3a5
> >        [<ffffffff8100bf10>] tracesys+0xd5/0xda
> >        [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> > 
> > -> #0 (genl_mutex){--..}:
> >        [<ffffffff81050226>] print_circular_bug_header+0xc8/0xcf
> >        [<ffffffff810517d0>] __lock_acquire+0x951/0xc28
> >        [<ffffffff81216e4c>] ctrl_dumpfamily+0x31/0xf7
> >        [<ffffffff81051e5d>] lock_acquire+0x51/0x6c
> >        [<ffffffff81216e4c>] ctrl_dumpfamily+0x31/0xf7
> >        [<ffffffff8104eab1>] debug_mutex_lock_common+0x16/0x23
> >        [<ffffffff8127c622>] mutex_lock_nested+0xde/0x23f
> >        [<ffffffff81050a10>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xf3/0x117
> >        [<ffffffff81216e4c>] ctrl_dumpfamily+0x31/0xf7
> >        [<ffffffff812137e3>] netlink_dump+0x5b/0x19d
> >        [<ffffffff81214ef3>] netlink_recvmsg+0x180/0x2a8
> >        [<ffffffff811f1a48>] sock_recvmsg+0xf0/0x10f
> >        [<ffffffff8104582f>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
> >        [<ffffffff81050878>] mark_held_locks+0x49/0x67
> >        [<ffffffff811f295c>] sys_recvmsg+0x15c/0x254
> >        [<ffffffff81067ac3>] audit_syscall_entry+0x12d/0x160
> >        [<ffffffff8127d6da>] trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x35/0x3a
> >        [<ffffffff8100bf10>] tracesys+0xd5/0xda
> >        [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff


  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-24  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-24  7:39 iw lockdep warning on wireless-testing Zhu Yi
2008-06-24  8:59 ` Johannes Berg
2008-06-24  9:05   ` Zhu Yi [this message]
2008-06-24 15:03     ` Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1214298350.14590.238.camel@debian.sh.intel.com \
    --to=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).